Maybe because they divide & multiply, adapt/evolve, need a host(not sure about this part), etc.
bacteria is but for viruses some scientists believe they are alive and others think they dont so i can't give you an answer to that
virologist is a scientist that sudies viruses.
virologist is a scientist that sudies viruses.
Scientists who do not consider viruses to be alive argue that they lack the ability to replicate on their own and do not perform essential metabolic processes without a host cell. While they can evolve and adapt like living organisms, they depend entirely on host cells for survival and reproduction. This leads some scientists to view viruses as complex biological particles rather than living organisms.
A virologist is a scientist who studies viruses.
A scientist that studies viruses is called a virologist.
virologist
Viruses are not alive in the first place, so no.
Since viruses are not alive, they are not named by a genus or a species.
No, because viruses aren't alive.
-viruses and alive but bacteria is -viruses spread but dont multiply or change in your body, bacteria are alive and are often evolving -viruses cannot be treated, but bacteria can be eliminated with chemincals and anitbiotics
Certainly not. It is a hotly debated subject. Viruses (and prions for that matter) are not alive in a conventional sense.