answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

It's a fine bit of circular reasoning that requires that fossils found fit into the pre-decided place on the evolutionary chart. They then point to the fossil record as proof of the theory. There are many gaps and instances of "parallel evolution". For example, the focusing eye had to develop at least four separate times, for the evolutionary theory.

Answer:

Fossils are like the clues the police use to solve a crime.

Each one tells a story. Like clues to a crime, where the police don't have to find a print of every footstep taken by a subject or confirm every thing that he did, the clues paint a logical outline of all the events around the crime.

Like clues in a crime the police do not initially identify a person they want to pin the crime on and then seek to tie him to the event - they find a number of clues which identify potential subjects of interest. They then attempt to prove the relation of these suspects to the crime until the trail of evidence is strong and dependable. Usually multiple facts on the same evidence are considered - for a crime it might be fingerprints and video tape and eye witnesses, for fossils it could be carbon 14 and dendronchronology and geologic strata.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

Because it is one of the better pieces of evidence for showing the long trail of evolution and we are talking millions of years long. Molecular evidence is also becoming stronger and the accepted standard for evidence now-a-days, but cannot tell us as much about ancient fossils. The change of the whale, for instance, over time brings the point home--natural process drove this evolution.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

i think it means that contain different plants and criiters and those remians of the procession of the life indicate evolutionary change.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Explain how scientist use fossils to support the theory of evolution?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about General Science

How does Josiah Strong show that he supports the theory of evolution?

There is strong support for the theory of evolution due to fossils that have been found by archeologists. The fossil records show evidence of evolution over billions of years.


How does biogeography support the theory of evolution?

Biogeography is the study of the distribution of species (biology) spatially (geography) and temporally (history). Biogeography aims to reveal where organisms live, at what abundance, and why they are or are no) found in a certain geographical area. Biogeography does not support the theory of evolution any more then when (history) you (biology) moved into your house (geography).


What was the Neo Darwinism theory of evolution based on?

The theory of evolution is that species aren't fixed; new species can evolve from existing species. The earliest recorded theory of evolution dates back to the ancient Greeks - Anaximander in 650BC proposed that life originated in the sea and later moved to the land. The theory was postulated again in the 18th century; fossils had been discovered of extinct animals - including of "primitive" forms of modern animals. At the time, multiple floods were proposed to explain fossils of extinct animals - although it was never explained where all the water went in between floods! The discovery of fossils of extinct animals with fossils of existing animals was very hard to explain with flood theory - how could some animals survive a flood and others not? To explain evolution several theories have been proposed; Larmarck suggested that offspring inherited characteristics from parents that they had acquired during life - for example, giraffes stretching to reach high leaves on trees grew longer necks - the longer necks were passed on to their offspring. The problem with Larmarckian evolution is that there wasn't a mechanism to explain how acquired characterstics could be passed on; if you have a scar on body from an injury, your children aren't born with the same scar. It was the careful research of Charles Darwin and Alfred Wallace that led to the natural selection theory - which provides a mechanism for evolution. Darwin, in particular, provided a large amount of evidence to support the theory.


Why are missing link fossils a powerful evidence for Creation and not for evolution?

Some people who reject the biblical account of Creation think that living things went though gradual changes (biological evolution) from one kind to another. In order to support their beliefs, they find fossils that, when lined up, seem to show a continuous change from simpler organisms to a much larger and more complex one. But fossils for the most part do not show gradual changes from one kind to another. They are clearly one kind or another not something in between. For example; fossils of mice exist and fossils of bats exist, but no fossils of half-winged, mouse like creatures have been found.


How does observed evolutionary change support the scientific theory of evolution?

The theory predicts that evolution will happen and in certain ways. The observed evolution makes this prediction correct. It also defines evolution as happening, and as such is perfect evidence in support of it.

Related questions

Why fossils support the theory of continental movement?

explain how fossils support the theory of continental movement


What is the name of a fossil that disproves evoloution?

No fossils disprove evolution, but support it


How do fossil support evolution?

Fossils show the geological history of man and animals.


How are fossils used to oppose the theory of evolution?

Fossils are not used to oppose the theory of evolution. They acutually support it in every way. So far not one fossil has been found that is not exactly where you would expect it to be if evolution were true. As we dig deeper we go further back in time and see by piecing fossils together how organisms evolved over time. Although we don't need fossils to support the fact that evolution is happening, it's a nice bonus to have in support of the theory.


What are the types of evidence that support evolution?

\that the animals can be found all around the world fossils


How does Josiah Strong show that he supports the theory of evolution?

There is strong support for the theory of evolution due to fossils that have been found by archeologists. The fossil records show evidence of evolution over billions of years.


What evidences exist to support evolution?

Fossils, Similarities in early development, and similar body structures


What types of evidence do scientists use to support evolution?

Fossils, D.N.A., vestigial organs or structure, same structure diffrent function.


How do fossil and biochemicals support the theory of evolution?

Because due to Darwins theory of evolution, fossils lead to adaptations over time therefor giving us reason to find evolution within human beings and animals.


How are fossils a piece of evidence to support evolution?

Fossils show the progression of ancient organisms. By comparing older fossils with more recent fossils, we can see how older ones are related in body structure to newer ones, supporting the idea that new generations evolve from older ones.


What evidence of earths climate in the past supports the theory of contnental drift?

It is not so much the climate, but it is the tectonic plates movement, and fossils of extincted animals on different continents that support this theory. Also, fossils support the theory of evolution that was proven by Charles Darwin.


What are the six scientific advances since Darwins death that have provided support for the theory of evolution?

There is nothing newly or old that support Darwin's evolution theory.Some of scientists reject Darwin's Theory of evolution and some of them don't. t I personally support it fairly due to my own beliefs and other scientist reject it for their on. Don't think that what you read in the Internet is always correct. The edge of science will always be on debate. Let me note that Darwin lived in another era and the ability of explaining natural laws was not even close than the way we can explain it today. So for me he earned my respected.