Some people are impulsive buyers and do not realise the responsibility of looking after an animal, though sometimes if people already know a lot about the animal already or have had the animal before they may not need to do excess research. If you are looking to get a animal for the first time.
I suggest researching the animal so that you can find the right foods or the right cage for the animal. Animal charities often give the best advice on how to handle the animals.
Vertebrates and invertebrates... V = Animals with backbone IV= Animals without backbone
nor plants or animals. bacteria came first
yes, i do. animals are a unique part of todays society. without animals we would not have gotten to the moon because animals were the first living things from earth into space.
Black people wrote the first book about wild animals native to NC
When developing new drugs and medical procedures they have to be tested first before giving them to the general public. The question is, is it better to test these things (which may be very harmful and painful) on animals first or people first. This is a personal question you have to answer for yourself. Right now our laws allow for animal research so most people think its the better choice. Maybe in the future scientists will find a better way to do these tests without animals or people.
If you are referring to the first European immigrants to Canada, they hunted beavers. The aboriginal people who were there first, hunted all sorts of animals.
well first frog and more animals would dye
If you mean the first animals people had, then no, wolves (now dogs) were the first.
yes
First of all if there were no people in the Earth?
Nothing, without egg, there is no animal, without animal NO EGG,wew =)
well first frog and more animals would dye