answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Because they elected George W. Bush.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why do some believe that the process of how US supreme court justices are appointed should be changed?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Are the justices on the Supreme Court voted for?

Yes. Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States are appointed by the President, and confirmed by a vote in the Senate. However, ordinary citizens do not take part in this process.


Do US Supreme Court Justices have to be reelected periodically?

They are never elected nor are they re-confirmed. The US Supreme Court Justices are appointed for life. They are nominated by the President and then confirmed by the U S Senate.On the other hand, state supreme court justices often have term limitations. In those states where justices are elected or reconfirmed periodically, the reelection process is instituted because justices may be eligible to serve multiple terms, and are placed on the court by general election.


What is the difference between how federal judges are nominated vs how supreme court justices are nominated?

The process of nominating federal judges and Supreme Court justices is similar, but there are a few key differences. Federal judges are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate, while Supreme Court justices go through the same process but with heightened scrutiny and public attention. Additionally, Supreme Court justices serve lifetime appointments, while federal judges may serve either lifetime or fixed terms depending on the specific court.


How are the justices of state supreme courts elected?

The method of electing justices to state supreme courts can vary depending on the state. In some states, justices are elected through partisan elections, where they appear on the ballot affiliated with a specific political party. In other states, justices may be selected through non-partisan elections, where their political affiliation is not listed on the ballot. There are also states where justices are appointed by the governor or selected through a merit-based appointment process.


Which US supreme court judges were recess appointments?

There are no current Supreme Court justices who were recess appointments. However, President George Washington appointed John Rutledge as Chief Justice in a recess appointment; his appointment was later rejected by the Senate. President Eisenhower also made three recess appointments to the Supreme Court, all of whom were later confirmed by the Senate.


Are US Supreme Court justices politicians?

While US Supreme Court justices are appointed by presidents and undergo a confirmation process, they are intended to be impartial and make decisions based on the Constitution and the law, rather than political considerations. However, it is recognized that justices can have ideological leanings and their decisions can be influenced by their personal beliefs and values to some extent.


What best describes presidential nominations of justices to the Supreme Court?

Politicized process.


In what court are judges appointed?

Judges and justices are appointed to all Article III federal courts, such as the US District Courts, US Court of Appeals Circuit Courts, US Court of International Trade, and the Supreme Court of the United States. Some states use a Gubernatorial or Legislative appointment process, too, although most use popular election or a combination of appointment and election.


Who has the power of appoint judges to courts?

The SenateArticle III Federal judges (US District Court, US Courts of Appeals Circuit Courts), like the justices of the US Supreme Court, are appointed by the President of the United States, with the "advice and consent" (approval) of the Senate. The House of Representatives has no role in this process.


By what process are federally elected or appointed officials held accountable for their conduct?

through the impeachment process.


Is it appropriate for US Supreme Court justices to be active in the selection of new justices?

It is generally not appropriate for US Supreme Court justices to be actively involved in the selection of new justices. The process of selecting new justices should be independent and free from any potential bias or conflicts of interest. This ensures that the justices are selected based on their qualifications and merit rather than personal or political affiliations.


Why does the selection process of justices can sometimes lead to an impasse?

Unfortunately the process is generally completely controlled by politics. The Governor or higher politicians usually appoint Justices. After their appointment, election is usually unopposed and an almost automatic reelection unless they do something to make someone made.