Wiki User
∙ 9y agoBe notified when an answer is posted
There are a few reasons why some might fuss over hamlet should be in the western canon. The main reason would be the work had appeal across cultures.
Only Cuba. Some might argue that Venezuela is, but legally, it's not.
The fall of Rome is usually considered to have occurred in 476 A.D. when the Western Empire was taken over by the barbarian King Odacer. Emperor of the Eastern Empire (Xeno) recognized Odacer as a legitimate ruler of the Western Empire therefore causing a debate of Rome's actual "fall."As for falling in 800 AD, I suppose one could argue it "fell again" (the western empire) when Charlemagne was crowned Emperor of Rome (in 800 AD). Although there was already a crowned emperor of the western Roman empire at the time, Pope Leo III decided to crown him anyway. This I guess this could be a reason someone would be able to argue that Rome fell again. I personally think the point in which it started to slowly deteriorate was in the aforementioned date 476 B.C. thus causing it to die out slowly as oppose to an exact date in which it "fell."I'm no historian, just a history student and I hope this may help even if it is just a little bit. I'd site more sources, but I don't think you would care to look at the exact source I did because most sources give the facts that I gave.
An event that took place in the 4/5th century in Rome. Some Christians bent to the will of Diocletian during the great persecution and the Donatists didn't think that those people's faith was valid any longer. There was controversy over who should be bishop of Carthage. So they sent representatives to Rome to argue their case but Constantine ruled that they were wrong. They still wouldn't give up so Constantine persecuted them, but that just made them martyrs.
Rome collapsed in 476 A.D. The conventional date for the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire is 476, the year when Romulus Augustus, the last emperor of the western part of this empire, was deposed. The eastern part of the Roman Empire fell in 1453 , when Constantinople was conquered by the Ottoman Turks.
There are a few reasons why some might fuss over hamlet should be in the western canon. The main reason would be the work had appeal across cultures.
It has had broad appeal across many cultures for more than 400 years.
It has had broad appeal across many cultures for more than 400 years.
No, it is not, but you will probably find some people that will argue that it should be.
Some people say hydrogen should be above lithium (Li) and others argue that it should be above fluorine (F) because it has a valence shell that only accepts two electrons.
Of course not. It depends what you argue about though. There is a very fine line between argument and debates. Often people argue about different tastes in things like music when they should just debate it.
People should resist unfair laws.
people should disobey unjust laws~apex
There are two interpretations of your question: 1. Why does my boyfriend argue with me first and then argue with the people who cause us problems? 2. Why does my boyfriend argue with me rather than with the people who cause us problems? Which is it?
Yeah... People need speed limits to know the correct speed to drive, some people may argue that people will know what speed they should drive at, but what about people who are new?
Argument. People who "argue" can be said to be having an "argument".
You can argue that people should have the freedom to purchase whatever legal beverages they want. People are responsible for exercising their own self control by limiting how much soda they drink, but there shouldn't be a ban that limits their freedom to choose what they drink.