Saint-Simon's structure for leading society emphasized the importance of industrial and scientific experts to guide and organize society. He believed that these experts would provide the necessary knowledge and expertise to solve social problems and improve the well-being of the population. Additionally, Saint-Simon advocated for a system that rewarded merit and contributions to society, rather than traditional social hierarchies based on birth and privilege.
Plato believed that philosopher kings possess wisdom, knowledge, and foresight to make just and informed decisions for the betterment of society. He thought that their pursuit of truth and virtue would lead them to govern selflessly and with the best interests of the people in mind, ultimately leading to a harmonious and just society.
Socrates believes that citizens of Athens should be ashamed because he thought they were more focused on wealth, power, and material possessions than on developing their moral character and pursuing knowledge and truth. He thought that they were neglecting what was truly important in life, leading to a society that was morally corrupt and intellectually stagnant.
Humanists wanted to reform society by promoting education, critical thinking, and human potential. They believed that by emphasizing reason, ethics, and individualism, society could progress and create a better world for all. They aimed to empower individuals to think independently and make positive contributions to society.
Nietzsche believed that the idea of God had lost its significance and influence in modern society due to advances in science, reason, and individualism. He argued that traditional religious beliefs no longer provided a meaningful framework for understanding the world, leading to a "death of God" metaphorically speaking. This shift left a void that needed to be filled with new values and interpretations of existence.
Philosophy helps individuals to think critically, analyze complex ideas, and question assumptions, leading to a deeper understanding of oneself, society, and the world. It fosters intellectual growth, encourages ethical reflection, and promotes tolerance for diverse perspectives, enriching and enhancing our lives.
Saint Simon envisaged a secular humanist religion to replace the traditional religions with scientists as instructors. I do not believe this would work, as it eliminates faith and hope, which are two instinctual parts of the human society
One of the differences between structure and classes socially is that structure is the organization of society, and classes are the stratification within that society. Think of it like a closet, and the different styles of clothes within the closet.
It taught people their place in society.
I think it is a shell structure.
Karl Marx believed that the economic system, specifically the mode of production, defined the social structure of society. He argued that the division of labor and the ownership of the means of production created classes and determined social relationships.
i think because it a non compleat structure i think because it a non compleat structure
Generally agriculture was what led to the formation of civilisation. Farming required a settled society and enabled the formation of more complex social structure, create a production surplus. The term civilisation refers to the process of a society developing into a centralized, urbanized, stratified structure. It is a society with a centralised state, a state ideology, taxation, social division into classes, specialisation of labour and monumental architecture.
i think you mean "pest to society"
why do you think new England merchants became leading members of scociety
solid structure
i think its oil
I think its a mass structure:)