I think it is valuable only because it does provide you alot of information that you ask sometimes it doesn't give you any thing you are asking because it can't provide you what you want at the time.
I think it is valuable only because it does provide you alot of information that you ask sometimes it doesn't give you any thing you are asking because it can't provide you what you want at the time.
Information from Internet sources can be both valuable and dangerous, because there are a large amount of resources available for many topics. The more sources available on a subject, the more likely it is that some will have incorrect information.
Primary sources are more valuable to modern historians because they are more reliable.
secondary
While primary sources are valuable for firsthand accounts, they can still be biased or incomplete. Secondary sources provide analysis and interpretation of primary sources, offering a broader perspective. It's essential to consider multiple sources to gain a comprehensive understanding of a topic.
I don't think it is dangerous
They steal valuable information. e.g passwords and bank details
they are very rare and i think they are not dangerous.
It is not as dangerous as you think.
A dangerous power source is one that has the potential to cause harm to individuals or the environment if not managed properly. This can include sources such as nuclear power, high-voltage electricity, or volatile chemicals. Proper safety measures and regulations are crucial to prevent accidents and mitigate risks associated with these power sources.
One article or source found by searching Google
Literary sources can provide valuable insight into people's beliefs, customs, and daily life, but they may be subjective or biased. Archaeological sources provide tangible evidence of past societies and can offer more objective information about material culture and social practices. Both types of sources are valuable, and using them together can provide a more comprehensive understanding of history.