Current copyright law doesn't have a reasonable balance between the rights of owners and the public good.
No provision is made to deal with orphan works, which are becoming increasingly common.
Using the fair use defense against infringement charges is a "guilty until proven innocent" situation; fair use should be the assumption, and the onus should be on the owner to prove infringement.
Although "willful" infringement is more serious on paper, in practice little or no distinction is made between casual, accidental infringement and intentional, institution, wholesale infringement.
Because technological advances have the ability to change the environment so utterly, a complete review of the law should happen every 5 years at a minimum. Most countries are using laws that never anticipated the internet, and trying to apply the same rules to physical and digital materials.
The law has changed and the copyright symbol is no longer needed to insure the protection of the copyright owner. The symbol for copyright is: ©
The only person who can legally do anything about copyright infringement is the rights holder or his/her designated agent. That is who you should inform.
Prior to 1989 is was necessary to display a copyright notice in order to maintain protection on a work. That year the US signed the Berne Copyright Convention which standardized copyright law across national borders. One of the provisions that Berne contained was that a copyright notice would no longer be required. US law was amended to bring it into compliance.
Yes. It would be breaking the law to do otherwise.
In the US, since copyright law was amended in 1989, it has not been necessary to display a copyright notice for protection.
Copyright law is a federal law, granted in the Constitution.
I think so
Copyright law.
Malaysia's copyright law is Act 332, the Copyright Law of 1987. More information can be found at the link below.
As a member of the World Trade Organization, Australian copyright law is based on the Berne Convention, although a 2005 treaty with the US has changed it slightly: works are automatically protected for the life of the creator plus 70 years. The related law is the Copyright Act 1968, as amended.
No; although UK copyright law changed at least twice between the first and second editions, the first editions should still be protected.
No. Copyright is federal law.