answersLogoWhite

0

Why do your laws punish so severely for the act of murder?

Updated: 8/19/2019
User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

Best Answer

Because murder is the ultimate crime, the taking of a life, which is unacceptable legally as well as morally and spiritually.

Added: There is no saying "I'm sorry," after the victim you killed is dead and gone.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why do your laws punish so severely for the act of murder?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What are laws that punish for a legal act in the past?

Retroactive laws are specifically prohibited by the US Constitution.


How can someone be convicted of murder if they did not do it but they were present when it happened?

It depends upon the states laws, in many states just being a party in the act they can charge you with the act.


Five British laws mainly designed to punish the people of Boston in retaliation for the Boston Tea Party?

The Coercive Acts were the acts that King George used to punish the Colonies. Some include blocking off the Boston Harbor, preventing trade, a second Quartering Act, and the Quebec Act.


What did the colonists call the four laws that parliament passed to punish the colonists of Massachusetts?

The Intolerable act, Proclamation of 1773, Boston Massacre, Boston Tea Party.


What is the duration of An Act of Murder?

The duration of An Act of Murder is 1.52 hours.


How can you use punish in a sentence?

Please don't punish me with another pun. It is the court's decision of just how to punish the perpetrators of this heinous act of vandalism.


When was An Act of Murder created?

An Act of Murder was created on 1948-12-05.


Which British act was made specifically to punish Boston?

The Coercive Acts were made specifically to punish Boston.


Why were the laws of the twelve tables unable to prevent corruption in the later roman empire?

Laws, any laws, do not prevent crime or corruption. They are a code of public conduct and at times act as a deterrent to crime. Just because there is a law forbidding an act, does not mean that the act won't occur. In our present day we have laws against rape, murder, robbery and drunk driving, but these acts still occur. The ancient Romans were no different in finding loopholes or simply breaking laws.Laws, any laws, do not prevent crime or corruption. They are a code of public conduct and at times act as a deterrent to crime. Just because there is a law forbidding an act, does not mean that the act won't occur. In our present day we have laws against rape, murder, robbery and drunk driving, but these acts still occur. The ancient Romans were no different in finding loopholes or simply breaking laws.Laws, any laws, do not prevent crime or corruption. They are a code of public conduct and at times act as a deterrent to crime. Just because there is a law forbidding an act, does not mean that the act won't occur. In our present day we have laws against rape, murder, robbery and drunk driving, but these acts still occur. The ancient Romans were no different in finding loopholes or simply breaking laws.Laws, any laws, do not prevent crime or corruption. They are a code of public conduct and at times act as a deterrent to crime. Just because there is a law forbidding an act, does not mean that the act won't occur. In our present day we have laws against rape, murder, robbery and drunk driving, but these acts still occur. The ancient Romans were no different in finding loopholes or simply breaking laws.Laws, any laws, do not prevent crime or corruption. They are a code of public conduct and at times act as a deterrent to crime. Just because there is a law forbidding an act, does not mean that the act won't occur. In our present day we have laws against rape, murder, robbery and drunk driving, but these acts still occur. The ancient Romans were no different in finding loopholes or simply breaking laws.Laws, any laws, do not prevent crime or corruption. They are a code of public conduct and at times act as a deterrent to crime. Just because there is a law forbidding an act, does not mean that the act won't occur. In our present day we have laws against rape, murder, robbery and drunk driving, but these acts still occur. The ancient Romans were no different in finding loopholes or simply breaking laws.Laws, any laws, do not prevent crime or corruption. They are a code of public conduct and at times act as a deterrent to crime. Just because there is a law forbidding an act, does not mean that the act won't occur. In our present day we have laws against rape, murder, robbery and drunk driving, but these acts still occur. The ancient Romans were no different in finding loopholes or simply breaking laws.Laws, any laws, do not prevent crime or corruption. They are a code of public conduct and at times act as a deterrent to crime. Just because there is a law forbidding an act, does not mean that the act won't occur. In our present day we have laws against rape, murder, robbery and drunk driving, but these acts still occur. The ancient Romans were no different in finding loopholes or simply breaking laws.Laws, any laws, do not prevent crime or corruption. They are a code of public conduct and at times act as a deterrent to crime. Just because there is a law forbidding an act, does not mean that the act won't occur. In our present day we have laws against rape, murder, robbery and drunk driving, but these acts still occur. The ancient Romans were no different in finding loopholes or simply breaking laws.


What acting of great Britain pushed the colonists to revolution?

the Intolerable Act, also called the Coercive Act was a series of acts that imposed new taxes and laws; it was made to punish the colonist because of the Boston Tea Party. hope that helped!


Was the holocaust necessary?

No, the Holocaust was a vile act of murder. The Holocaust was an act of genocide; there is no need for murder.


Why were new immigration laws passed in 1920s?

The new immigration laws passed in the 1920s, such as the Emergency Quota Act of 1921 and the Immigration Act of 1924 (National Origins Act), were implemented to restrict and limit the number of immigrants entering the United States. These laws were largely driven by nativist sentiments, economic concerns, and fears of losing traditional American values due to the influx of immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe. The laws favored immigrants from Northern and Western Europe while severely limiting immigration from other regions.