Because tragedies are about powerful heroes
Because tragedies are about powerful heroes
Death of a Salesman shows the suffering of an ordinary man instead of a powerful and famous man.
Death of a Salesman shows the suffering of an ordinary man instead of a powerful and famous man.
He showed the suffering of an ordinary man.
He showed the suffering of the ordinary man.
The play involves ordinary people and the things that happen to them.
The play involves ordinary people and the things that happen to them.
The play shows the struggles of ordinary people. APEX.
Yes the story death of a salesman is a tragedy because it shows the sequence as being tragic and horrific because he kills himself in a car wreck. im afraid i cannot possibly agree...death of a salesman doesnt contain any of the features of a true tragedy defined by Aristotle. By that definition, many of Shakespeare's tragedies cannot be considered tragedy as they do not conform to Aristotle's definition of tragedy. Hamlet, considered his finest, breaks many of Aristotle's rules of tragedy. Surely we move on from purist classical definitions to embrace new modes of thinking. Miller's exploration of the plight of a common man is a Romantic concept in considering the common man worthy of study. Is not the common man as capable of tragedy as kings and queens?
There's no law against it. That doesn't mean the dealership or the first salesman is going to make it easy for you. Once you've been greeted by a salesman, at most dealerships they're considered to own you. In order to get a different salesman, you're probably going to have to leave and come back, and you might have to repeat this a couple of times before you actually do get someone different.
Muffler salesman: Exhausting Firework salesman: Really booming And I haven't figured out lumber salesman yet.
Yes the story death of a salesman is a tragedy because it shows the sequence as being tragic and horrific because he kills himself in a car wreck. By that definition, many of Shakespeare's tragedies cannot be considered tragedy as they do not conform to Aristotle's definition of tragedy. Hamlet, considered his finest, breaks many of Aristotle's rules of tragedy. Surely we move on from purist classical definitions to embrace new modes of thinking. Miller's exploration of the plight of a common man is a Romantic concept in considering the common man worthy of study. Is not the common man as capable of tragedy as kings and queens?