...It does support there rights. The only thing they may not do is become a priest and sometimes even they do.
The rights of women.
== ==
Helen Keller did support woman rights. and also donated to a bunch of charities in her time!!
John Hanning has written: 'Sermon on beneficience or universial charity' -- subject(s): Christian giving, Christianity, Religious aspects, Religious aspects of Women's rights, Sermons, Women's rights 'Rights of women vindicated in the following sermon' -- subject(s): American Sermons, Sermons, Sermons, American, Women and religion, Women's rights
Some people on both sides of that argument sincerely believe that their positions have scriptural support. Arguably, some others among those who oppose equal rights for women and others are actually demonstrating their innate hypocrisy. The ones who don't seem to support equal rights believe that God created men and women for different goals and purposes. They believe that men were created to be the spiritual leaders of the home and the greater society.
No, it was hardly a consideration open for debate.
women voting
In pagan Greece, women had considerable rights and were treated much as equals to men. Chirstianity changed this, introducing the notion from first-century Judaism, that women should be subservient to men.
The amount of money she gives to charity is not known, but she is known to support unions, women's rights, and gay rights.
No, mainly for abolitionist that saw slavery at his/her door step.
The main objectives of the women's rights protest in 2017 were to advocate for gender equality, reproductive rights, and an end to sexual harassment and discrimination. The outcomes included increased awareness of these issues, mobilization of support for women's rights, and a push for policy changes to address gender inequality.
Some people on both sides of that argument sincerely believe that their positions have scriptural support. Arguably, some others among those who oppose equal rights for women and others are actually demonstrating their innate hypocrisy.