1
Montresor chooses to punish his friend Fortunato by walling him up alive because he wants to enact a slow, torturous revenge that will cause Fortunato the most suffering. Killing him quickly would not provide the same level of satisfaction and retribution. Additionally, by walling Fortunato up alive, Montresor ensures that Fortunato experiences a prolonged and terrifying death.
Typically, this is called COLLECTIVE PUNISHMENT.
burning him
The offence did not warrant capital punishment. In Puritan society, they would seek to make an example of offences like that, which they did with Hester.
i ask you, why myself killer to people?
In 'The Cask of Amontillado,' the internal conflict is Montresor's desire for revenge against Fortunato, which is driven by perceived insults and injuries inflicted upon him by Fortunato. Montresor grapples with his decision to carry out his plan for retribution, ultimately leading to his inner turmoil and feelings of guilt that are revealed through his actions.
nothing
No, they are protected by law.
Sure. There are other possibilities for a fair punishment.
Killing somebudy
maxifrution killing, hanging, capital punishment, beheading
death but some ships had different punishments
Role of NHRC in protection of Human Rights in India