Want this question answered?
Because Russia wanted nuckes and we wanted nukes so it was all about who got them first
as per today's update Russia has more than 3000 nuclear warheads(deactivated),1200 warheads ready for use. US has nearly 2400 nuclear warheads stockpiled and 400 nukes ready for use.
If they fought a limited war it could go either way, depending on the circumstances, but I have trouble envisioning a limited war with nukes. Once the first nuke is detonated, it will probably lead to more nukes, with no limits, and no winners.
To the moron who wrote "USA has most advanced army and a jet that can go 12,000 miles and hour" your just a typical hypocrite and are a waste to forums like this so shut your facist trap. First of all America and Russia both have advanced weapons and fighter jets. Russia holds the worlds most nukes and Russia has the worlds largest landmass. USA has more people than Russia and has a more advanced military than Russia . USA has a higher population that Russia. At the moment it would be a tie since USA could never take over Russias landmass and Russia could never reach all their army to USA. It would end up in nukes.
Countries that have more land area than the US include Russia, Canada, China, and Brazil.
No because the United States have more stealth technologies, more intelligences and more powerful than Russia.
yes
Yes it does
The United States has more people than Russia. The population of the United States is around 330 million, while the population of Russia is around 145 million.
No, Russia has more than the US.
As of now (2012), Russia has slightly more than the US.
1) The US and Russia are for the most part no longer "enemies". 2) North Korea is very likely to use any possible nuclear technology against South Korea, which is a US ally; I don't think Russia wants to attack South Korea. 3) As I said earlier, Russia is not likely to attack the US, North Korea is.