Jellies have no bones. When they die, they just dissolve.
A clam.
A clam is more likely to fossilize than a jellyfish.
A clam is more likely. Jellies have no bones.
Clam shells are quite durable.
Because it is more resistant to biological and environmental destruction.
because they don't have any bones or solid structures to fossilize
They do not have any bones. No bones means there is nothing to fossilize.
No Sandy doesnt, Sandy lives in a dome. not anywhere near jellyfish or grass.
since a jellyfish has a structer that doesnt involve bones of a vertabra it falls in the classification of an invertabrate.
Jelly fish don't have bones or teeth which are typically what fossilizes. Jellyfish are mostly water so they decompose extremely easily. Its like trying to fossilize soggy jello. They live in open oceans so its difficult for a jellyfish to become fossilized when there isn't a whole lot of soil around.
Only under unusually specific conditions would a soft-bodied creature such as a jellyfish be capable of making a fossil. If deposited in an extremely fine suspension of mud, and presuming that there were no scavenging organisms present. Such fossils are known, and you'll find some data in wikipedia under Ediacaran.
The mushroom cap Jelly fish. Rhopilema verrilli