Because he seems to think everyone there is loyal and there is no use for them to swear an oath
That the murder of Caesar will be the oath.
The murder will be the oath.
Because he seems to think everyone there is loyal and there is no use for them to swear an oath
He thinks a just cause needs no oath to bind the doers to their cause
Because Brutus and Cassius like potatoe's
Because Brutus and Cassius like potatoe's
Brutus argues that an oath among the conspirators is unnecessary because he believes their cause is just and honorable. He feels that the shared commitment to their noble purpose should be sufficient to bind them together, as true honor should motivate them rather than a formal pledge. Additionally, Brutus fears that taking an oath could imply distrust among the conspirators, which would undermine their unity and resolve.
Brutus.
Brutus shows his rational and logical nature, as well as his idealism, by arguing that "what other oath than honesty to honesty engaged, that this shall be, or we will fall for it."
Yes you do. You must swear an oath of loyalty.
Because, as he argues, "what other oath than honesty to honesty engaged, that this shall be, or we will fall for it?" It is the same argument put forward in the Epistle of James (James 5:12) in the Bible: "Do not swear—not by heaven or by earth or by anything else. Let your "Yes" be yes, and your "No," no, or you will be condemned." In other words, if you are honest, what need is there for an oath?
I believe his says that their cause is strong enough to bond them to their words or something along those lines