Want this question answered?
The constitutional basis of Justice Murphy's dissent can be found in the fifth amendment. It is known as the equal protection doctrine, and it should have protected the young Korematsu from being sent to an American internment camp.
Korematsu v. United States, 323 US 214 (1944)Chief Justice Harlan F. Stone (1941-1946) presided over the Court for the Korematsu case, a challenge to the constitutionality of Executive Order 9066 that established Japanese Internment Camps during World War II.
Korematsu v. United States, 323 US 214 (1944)Chief Justice Harlan F. Stone presided over the Court that declared constitutional Executive Order 9066, mandating internment camps to imprison Japanese and Japanese-American citizens in the United States during WW II. Justice Hugo Black wrote the opinion of the Court.
President Bill Clinton awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the highest civilian honor in the United States, to Korematsu in 1998, saying, "In the long history of our country's constant search for justice, some names of ordinary citizens stand for millions of souls. Plessy, Brown, Parks ... to that distinguished list, today we add the name of Fred Korematsu." That year Korematsu served as the Grand Marshal of San Francisco's annual Cherry Blossom Festival parade
The constitutional basis of Justice Murphy's dissent can be found in the Fifth Amendment. It is known as the equal protection doctrine, and it should have protected the young Korematsu from being sent to an American internment camp.
most junior justice on the Court. most senior associate justice in the majority. chief justice, as in other cases. most senior associate justice in the minority. solicitor general.
He thinks it is not based on justice.
It means they disagreed with the majority ruling.
A US Supreme Court justice who disagrees with the majority opinion writes a dissenting opinion, explaining why he or she disagrees with the majority.
dissenting.
The Chief Justice's decision on a case carries the same weight as the other justices. And yes, it must be a majority opinion for the ruling to stand, but the Chief Justice does not have to agree.
A concurring opinion is written by a justice who agrees with the outcome reached by the majority, but who came to that conclusion in a different way and wants to write about why. A dissenting opinion is written by a justice who disagreed with the majority and wants his disagreement known and explained