Want this question answered?
New allele combinations are acted upon by natural selection
Under natural selection, not all genes are successful, but those which are will progress to the next stage of selection. Mutations introduce new genetic information to an organism's genetic code, providing more genotypes to create more phenotypes, which can be acted on and potentially more suitable ones to be selected.
organisms compete for shelter
A substrate is the substance acted upon by an enzyme. The enzyme substrate complex is when an enzyme molecule combines with its substrates.
The word 'evolution' can be used to indicate two things:The phenomenon of evolution, ie. the changing of allele frequencies in population gene pools (or, as Darwin originally put it, descent with modification).The theory of evolution, ie. the model that explains the diversity of life in terms of what we know about evolution, population genetics, and so on.We know the phenomenon of evolution exists because we can see it happening.As for the theory, there the evidence consists of a multitude of independent lines of observation, all pointing in the same direction:That modern lifeforms stem from a shared ancestry.That an important guiding force of evolution is natural selection.Common ancestry is demonstrated true by the nested hierarchies we find everywhere in life: in morphology, in genetics, in molecular biology, in embryology, in behavioural studies, etc. Basically, these observations show us that every group of organisms inherited its characteristics from a larger, more basal group, with a few unique changed added. This pattern is exactly what we would expect to find if common descent were true. Specific predictions can be made based on the general pattern, which can then be tested against detailed observations. Common ancestry is also demonstrated by the fossils we find: these show a progressing divergence of forms, starting out from the most basal forms, and then diverging towards more modern forms. The fossil record also provides numerous transitional forms, that are representative of intermediaries between basal forms and more modern forms.Natural selection is observed in nature, and can be readily tested in the lab. Not only do we see natural selection acting upon populations now, but we can also make predictions about what we should find in the genomes of various organisms if natural selection had acted upon certain traits in the past - and then test those predictions against the actual genomes.So that's how we know evolution is true.
Yes.
because there are alot of peters iin the world like obama
all i know is that its False
Because populations evolve. If their was no hereditary transfer of traits by germ line genes then there would be no true selection. Acquired traits, such as a personal habit, are invisible to selection. Somatic mutations that could be beneficial are also invisible to selection. Selection only acts on what is, germ lines in individuals, transmissible to future generation and the gene pool.
I'm assuming you meant "Why can only traits controlled by genes be acted upon by natural selection?" Genes hold all of the information that makes up something physically and to some extent psychological and that is what is past down to the offspring. That means any traits acquired can not be past down for example knowing how to hold a pen is not something that is stored in genes it is stored in memory therefore it can not be genetically passed down. If one day I were to get into a battle with a swords master I would win the battle because the pen is mightier then the sword. That would save my life and allow me to pass on my genes, but even though it played a role in natural selection by allowing me to live instead of the sword master it is not stored in the genes and therefore is not genetically passed down to the offspring.
dBecause the animal is adapted to its environment. :)
without variation's, all the members of a species would have the same traits.
New allele combinations are acted upon by natural selection
I'm assuming you meant "Why can only traits controlled by genes be acted upon by natural selection?" Genes hold all of the information that makes up something physically and to some extent psychological and that is what is past down to the offspring. That means any traits acquired can not be past down for example knowing how to hold a pen is not something that is stored in genes it is stored in memory therefore it can not be genetically passed down. If one day I were to get into a battle with a swords master I would win the battle because the pen is mightier then the sword. That would save my life and allow me to pass on my genes, but even though it played a role in natural selection by allowing me to live instead of the sword master it is not stored in the genes and therefore is not genetically passed down to the offspring.
Selection and Environmental change
Any morphological and behavioral trait that is in hard inheritance, genetic inheritance. Remember, all organisms are variants and these traits vary from organism to organism and so natural selection selects the best adapted trait among the population of organisms against the immediate environment. The trait that confers better survivability and reproductive success, So, evolution, the change in allele frequency over time in a population of organisms, occurs. Only natural selection confers adaptive change leading to speciation. Epigenetic changes are not adaptive changers.
Assume you have a population of people of various genetically influenced heights; they all varied in height potential. They all were raised in an environment that was deprived of basic nutrients and all were somewhat stunted in growth. A person that would have been tall in a normal environment passes on those genes for tallness in his deprived -of -nutrients environment, so his sons/daughters, if properly feed, would grow tall. So you see, natural selection must work on the genetic/individual variation and not variations that are not inherited.