Shakespeare uses apostrophe in Macbeth's soliloquy about the dagger because it allows for a more dramatic and intense tone. The use of apostrophe, in which Macbeth directly addresses the dagger as if it were a person, heightens the sense of unease and adds to the overall atmosphere of the scene. It also serves to portray Macbeth's growing paranoia and inner turmoil.
Shakespeare used apostrophe in Macbeth's soliloquy to create dramatic effect and emphasize Macbeth's hallucinations and inner turmoil. By having Macbeth address the dagger directly, it allows the audience to see the depth of his psychological struggle and descent into madness. It also adds an element of tension and suspense to the scene.
Shakespeare, duhhh!
The word Gordon does not appear in Macbeth or any of Shakespeare's works.
Having Macbeth describe it would be less dramatic. People often forget that Shakespeare was writing plays, and the rule in writing plays is "show, don't tell". From time to time Shakespeare feels constrained to have a character describe something in the middle of a play, because what is being described is hard or improper to stage or not worth staging For example, in Act 1 Scene 2 of Macbeth, the sergeant describes the battle, rather than going through the difficulty of staging it just to provide background. And in Taming of the Shrew we get a description of the wedding because it would be improper to portray a wedding on stage. However, it is much more effective to get the information out by having the characters interact with each other, with props or, as in this case, with figments of their imagination. Having Macbeth say, "The dagger appears to be insubstantial as it cannot actually be grasped and does not lose its form when a hand is passed through it" is pathetically limp compared to "Come! Let me clutch thee! I have thee not, and yet I see thee still!"
Lady Macbeth in Shakespeare's play Macbeth says, 'You know your own degrees'
William Shakespeare wrote Macbeth
In Shakespeare's play "Macbeth," the character Macbeth describes his crown as a "fruitless crown" that he has gained by committing murder and betraying those around him. He sees it as a symbol of his empty victory, tainted by guilt and regret.
Macbeth in Shakespeare's The Tragedy of Macbeth Lear in Shakespeare's King Lear Hamlet in Shakespeare's Hamlet Brutus in Shakespeare's Julius Caesar
Shakespeare was a man and Anne was a woman. Coincidentally the same applies to Macbeth and Lady Macbeth.
Both Macbeth and Lady Macbeth are necessary for the play. Neither would have murdered Duncan without the other. Shakespeare also wanted to explore the effects on their relationship of the guilt they experience after the murder.
I assume you meant "Why did Shakespeare make Macbeth a villan?" Well, what could the storyline have been if he wasn't a villan? Shakespeare's Macbeth was based on the real Macbeth. He murdered his king, Duncan, and became king. I guess that means that the real Macbeth was a villan, and so Shakespeare only kept it that way, showing it wasn't Shakespeare that made his character of Macbeth a villan.
Why do you think Macbeth is startled by the witches prediction's in act 1 of Macbeth by Shakespeare