0
What best describes how Zaroff justifies his hunting of human beings?
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Zaroff hunts humans instead of animales cause he says its boring to hunt animals sand he hunts humans casue their smart and more challenging unlike animals where there is no challenge at all
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Zaroff justifies his hunting of human beings by believing that he is superior to them intellectually and therefore has the right to hunt them for sport. He sees his victims as challenging prey that can provide him with a greater thrill and excitement than animals can. Zaroff's twisted logic leads him to view hunting humans as a natural extension of his pursuit of the ultimate hunting experience.
Anonymous
that is why i am asking duh
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Zaroff is an aristocrat and a racist use specific evidence from the text to support this claim?
In "The Most Dangerous Game," General Zaroff, an aristocrat, views himself as superior to others and displays racist attitudes towards his fellow human beings. He refers to humans as "brutes" and "scum" and justifies hunting them for sport as a way of asserting his dominance. Zaroff's belief in his entitlement to prey on others based on their perceived inferiority reflects his aristocratic mindset and racist ideology.
Compare and contrast rainsford and zaroff?
Rainsford is a famous American hunter and author of books about hunting. Zaroff also shares the love of hunting but he enjoys hunting human beings the most. Zaroff has fine clothes", and the "singularly handsome features of an aristocrat". Zaroff speaks very well, showing that he has been educated and refined. Both men enjoy; nice rooms, hunting big game, are same built, and much more. Rainsford is horrified when he first learns of what Zaroff is doing and realizes that hunting humans is just a game for Zaroff.
How does Connell portray General Zaroff as a civilized savage Please use three examples?
Connell portrays General Zaroff as a civilized savage by showing his sophisticated and aristocratic manners despite his cruel and immoral actions. This is evident when Zaroff engages in refined conversation with Rainsford while casually discussing hunting human beings. Additionally, Zaroff demonstrates his love for art and culture in his luxurious home, contrasting with his barbaric behavior of hunting humans for sport. Finally, Zaroff's adherence to a twisted sense of honor, such as giving his prey a head start before the hunt, showcases his complex and contradictory nature as a civilized man with savage instincts.
What is General Zaroff's main reason for preferring to hunt human beings rather than animals?
Genral Zaroff's main reason for preferring to hunt human beings rather than animals is because animal has no reasoning (e.g you shoot an animal he either chooses to run or charges straight at you and you can shoot it and kill it easy which is no chalange for Genral Zaroff). A reason he chooses to hunt humans is because they can reason with you and are more of a challenge (e.g the humans General Zaroff hunts can build weapons and try to kill or attack Genral Zaroff, which Genral Zaroff think is more fun then an animal charging against him).
What causes rainsford to know the full meaning of terror?
Extreme fear; fear that agitates body and mind; violent dread; fright., That which excites dread; a cause of extreme fear.
What is a good thesis statement about hunting?
Human beings have been hunting since our earliest existence on this world, and it is a fundamental part of our nature. Or, As human beings evolve toward greater compassion, we must leave behind the barbarity of hunting. (choose one)
What is your reaction to Zaroofs statement we try to be civilized here?
It's interesting that he says civilized, as his favorite sport is hunting human beings. However, he is very proper in his dress and living conditions, which is something Rainsford notes upon arriving at Zaroff's home. Also, Zaroff has a strange sense of fairness; while it's obviously not fair at all to force a person into playing a game where their life is as stake, especially against their will, Zaroff thinks that letting Rainsford have a single weapon and a head start is enough to consider the game "fair". Civilized, it would seem, is an extremely relative term in this story.
What does the word scruples mean in the excerpt from The Most Dangerous Game by Richard Connell?
In "The Most Dangerous Game," the word scruples refers to Rainsford's ethical hesitation or reluctance to participate in General Zaroff's hunting game. It showcases Rainsford's internal conflict over the moral implications of hunting other human beings.
Who are the characters in The Most Dangerous Game?
Ivan, Rainsford, Zaroff, WhitneyThe characters of the most dangerous game are:Ivan, Sanger Rainsford and General Zaroff.Ivan Ivan is the deaf and dumb assistant to General Zaroff. He is extremely large and seems to enjoy torturing and murdering helpless captives. Indeed, Zaroff uses the threat of turning his huntees over to Ivan if they will not comply with his desire to hunt them; the huntees invariably choose to be hunted rather than face the brutal Ivan. Ivan, like Zaroff, is a Cossack - a Russian who served as a soldier to the Russian Czar in the early 1900s. Ivan dies as the result of one of Rainsford's traps.Sanger RainsfordAfter hearing gunshots in the darkness, Sanger Rainsford falls off a yacht into the Caribbean Sea. "It was not the first time he had been in a tight place," however. Rainsford is an American hunter of world renown, and is immediately recognized by General Zaroff as the author of a book on hunting snow leopards in Tibet. While he shares both an interest in hunting and a refined nature with Zaroff, Rainsford believes Zaroff s sport to be brutal and Zaroff himself to be a murderer. As the object of the hunt, Rainsford constantly attempts to preserve his "nerve" and uses his knowledge of hunting and trapping to elude Zaroff. Rainsford becomes terrified, however, as Zaroff outwits him (but allows him to live) and toys with him as if he were a mouse. Having already killed Zaroff's assistant, Ivan, and one of Zaroff's dogs, Rainsford surprises Zaroff in his bedroom. Rainsford refuses to end the game there, however, and kills Zaroff. Rainsford then spends a comfortable night in Zaroff's bed, which raises the question of whether he will simply replace the evil Zaroff.General ZaroffGeneral Zaroff greets the stranded Rainsford by sparing his life, but later hunts him and attempts to kill him. Zaroff is distinguished by a "cultivated voice," fine clothes, the "singularly handsome" features of an aristocrat - and an obsession for hunting human beings. He has established a "palatial chateau" in which he lives like royalty with his servant Ivan, his hunting dogs, and his stock of prey - the poor sailors unlucky enough to end up on the island. Zaroff's decoy lights indicate "a channel. . . where there is none" and cause ships to crash into the rocks off the coast of his island. He captures the shipwrecked sailors and forces them to play his game or be tortured and killed by Ivan. Zaroff toys with Rainsford, declining to murder him three times to prolong the game. To him, the life and death struggle is little more than a game and, while insulting Rainsford's morality, he asserts that his embrace of human killing for sport is very modern, even civilized. Zaroff, like Ivan, is a Cossack and "like all his race, a bit of a savage"; yet he also claims a past as a high-ranking officer for the former Tsar of Russia. Zaroff's refined manners, and poised and delicate speech contrast with his brutal passion.Sanger Rainsford: He is an American big-game hunter and author who saw action in France in the First World War. He exhibits no pity or sympathy for the animals that he hunts. Ironically, he himself becomes a hunted animal after he arrives on a mysterious island. Rainsford is the protagonist, or the main character of this story. Whether his experience on the island changes his attitude toward hunted animals is open to question.General Zaroff: Russian big-game hunter from an aristocratic family in the Crimea, a Ukraine peninsula that was part of Russia until recent times. Zaroff is bored with killing typical game such as tigers, elephants, and water buffalo. Instead, he hunts the ultimate trophy animal: man. Zaroff, a Cossack, commanded a cavalry division in the Russian army until the Bolsheviks revolted in 1917 and installed a communist government that abolished aristocracy and the class system. Zaroff went off then and established a new world for himself on a remote Caribbean island. There he maintains his aristocratic lifestyle in his palatial home while pursuing his barbaric hobby. One might call him a civilized savage.Whitney: Rainsford's hunting partner.Ivan: Zaroff's Russian servant and hunting partner. Like Zaroff, he is a Cossack. Ivan is a giant, the biggest man Rainsford has ever seen. Because he is a deaf mute, Ivan hears no evil and speaks no evil but simply does Zaroff's bidding.Neilsen: Captain of the yacht taking Rainsford and Whitney to Brazil. He is referred to but plays no active role in the story.Crewmen of the San Lucar:Shipwrecked sailors held captive in Zaroff's cellar. The general plans to use them as quarry. They play no active role in the story.By: Pu3 (...pOeTRy...)
Is elephant hunting bad for the world?
Yes, it's wrong to hunt such beautiful, intelligent beings
How long have the tigers been endagerd?
Since human beings started hunting them, they have been on the endangered list.
What ironic effect do details such as Zaroff's fine clothes expensive furnishings and knowledge of classical music have on the reader's impression of him?
These details create an ironic effect by portraying Zaroff as a sophisticated and cultured gentleman, which is contradictory to his true nature as a cold-blooded hunter who preys on human beings. The contrast between his refined appearance and his barbaric actions shocks the reader, highlighting the depth of his depravity.
