Want this question answered?
Expressed by itself, 5 is not a fraction - it is an integer.
If you have a set S, the only improper subset of S is S itself. An improper subset contains all elements of S and no others. It is therefore equivalent to S. For example if S ={1,2,3} then the improper subset is {1,2,3}, and an example proper subset is {1,2}.
2.33 is, itself, an improper fraction. It is a fraction in decimal form rather than in the form of a ratio. However, that does not stop it being a fraction. Its equivalent, in improper rational form, is 2 33/100.
Recall that Improper subset of A is the set that contains all and only elements of A. Namely A. So does the empty set have all of A provided A is not empty? Of course not! The empty set can be only considered an improper subset of itself.
When you divide a fraction by itself, the result is always 1. This is because dividing any number by itself is equal to 1.
No. It would be quite improper, and probably draw not-so-good attention. Take my advice! :$
502 over 125 is the simplest impoper fraction in and of itself
4.75 is, itself, an improper fraction. It is a fraction in decimal form rather than in the form of a ratio. However, that does not stop it being a fraction. Its equivalent, in rational form, is 19/4.
Huntingtons Disease
Bob!
If he number has a multiple other than itself it is composite.
this depends on a persons body type, a simple diet will not reduce a persons belly fat by itself it must be accompanied by an appropriate amount of exercise