They don't need to. Some real changes come from differently thinking parties.
For example, "The Rent is Too High"--Jimmy McMillan
here's what you click: first: yes, naturally second: we dont have to fight third: dont give up hope!
There is no simple answer to this, but I'll give you the one that is most direct. Election laws make it difficult for third parties to get on ballots. Cannot win if you are not in the race. Second, third parties have a difficult time gaining traction in modern times. Once a third party gains a measure of success, one of the two major parties takes up all the third parties issues, thus making the third party powerless. Finally, there is a rule in political science called Duverger's law. It states that in a single-member district plurality, only two parties can survive. Here is the wikipedia link to this law: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duverger's_law
Due to interference from third parties.
Yes. The democrats and Republicans are constantly adapting their platforms to the needs of the country. When any movement among the people becomes strong enough, one of the leading parties takes it up. <<<Page 99 in Social Civics Book.
His dying command was 'dont give up the ship' during the war of 1812
I don't know. I dont like history
To persevere.
because dopnt smoke and dont eat bad things and dont give up because dopnt smoke and dont eat bad things and dont give up
dont give up..
dont give up
compromise
The third form of "give up" is "given up." This is the past participle used in perfect tenses, such as "have given up." The phrase means to stop trying or to surrender effort toward a goal or task.