The relationship between science and Ethics
Experts say that the Modern World began on 1919 when a couple pictures takes from Sobral, Brazil and Occidental Africa proved a new theory of the universe, "The Theory of Relativity". This sounded as the voice of a new era, and it was. Due to this pictures, during most of the 1920´s, the world experienced a decline in the religious beliefs, especially among the educated people because they realized, thank to science, that the world "created by gods" and described in old books, never existed. Consequently, how can people even consider that science do not affect ethics?
Throughout history, there have been thousand of scientists who, with their discoveries and ideas, have influenced the world. I would only describe three of them, which I consider the most influential thinkers of recent times. Our history begins with Galileo. He created on the XVII century, what became the ferment of the natural philosophy which was the origin of the scientific and industrial revolutions. On the other hand, The Newtonian physics which was a huge part of the XVIII century Enlightment also contributed to the modern nationalism and the revolutionary politics while the Darwinian concept of the survival of the fittest was the key element in both, the Marxist concept of class warfare as well as the racial philosophies that shaped Hitlerism.
Ethics is something that has application to real life.
Ethics is usually a discussion in philosophy. However there is the interdisciplinary study of the philosophy of science, which has a branch that deals with ethics in science. Though not often noticed ethics is BEHIND science. Ethics is not science, it is the base of science. All the basics of Western Ethics are 1 to 1 copied to 'science'. The very basic of western ethics is presuming a mind body split. That means that PER DEFINITION reality is seen as sum of immaterial things (metaphysics) and material things (physics). Immaterial things are 'soul', 'mind', 'consciousness', 'understanding'. This assumption when related to 'soul' and 'spirit' is often called 'creationism'. Believing in 'consciousness', 'understanding', .. is not different at all, but now called 'rationalism'
Ethics is a branch of philosophy, not a branch of science (although scientists can still strive to be ethical).
Regular ethics are the science of morals, and morals or little ethics are guidelines of ethics.
Ethics is a branch of philosophy, not a branch of science (although scientists can still strive to be ethical).
Ethics are just like morals-a code of conduct. Science of course is a fact gathering process.
bioethics
No. While ethics have an affect on how we conduct scientific studies, it is itself a field covered by philosophy rather than science.
Ethics.
Ethics is considered a practical science because its object is not merely to present truths that they are to be known, but to present truths that are to be acted upon.
Ethics is considered a practical science because it has influenced other types of science. For instance, other types of sciences that deal with humans use ethical principles.
The study of ethics is a normative science. There is no absolute right or wrong. The ethical standards change from business to business and from one generation to the next.