Because weird people out there go and run around crazy shooting everything they see. Geez take a break people!
879,546,001
Drunks with guns Hillbillies
Harry V. Reynolds has written: 'Evaluation of the effects of harvest on grizzly bear population dynamics in the northcentral Alaska Range' -- subject(s): Grizzly bear, Wildlife management, Mortality, Effect of hunting on, Bear populations 'Effects of harvest of grizzly bear population dynamics in the northcentral Alaska Range' -- subject(s): Grizzly bear, Mortality, Effect of hunting on, Bear populations 'Effects of harvest rates on grizzly bear population dynamics in the northcentral range' -- subject(s): Grizzly bear, Mortality, Effect of hunting on, Bear populations
No we still have some. The population is less, but they are around.
A thematic map would be most likely used to depict grizzly bear population, displaying the distribution and density of grizzly bears in different regions. This type of map would visually represent the data through colors, symbols, or shading to show the concentration and dispersion of grizzly bear populations.
Grizzlies are hunted for trophies, for meat and hide and for population control.
Alaska may have the largest. Along with Wyoming.
Whether or not Sarah Palin is in the mood to shoot them or not!
Thematic map
1860-1890 the population changed from 34,000 to 410,000. 1890-1930 the population changed from 410,000 to 1,025,000. 1930-1970 the population changed from 1,025,000 to 2,200,000. 1970-present the population changed from 2,200,000 to 5,025,000.
There would be no more grizzly bears which may tamper with the ecosystem because now there will be an over population of fish and other things they bears used to eat.
Compared to panda, grizzly's extinction status is not a concern. But it is affected by hunting and habitat loss. There are currently an estimated 55 000 grizzly bears in North America. For comparison, a 2006 estimate of giant panda population in the wild is around 2000-3000.