0
Why have historians often neglected pastoral peoples' role in world history?
Wiki User
∙ 11y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What are the two main sources of history?
There are several types of historical sources that can be used to study the events and people that have populated the world over time. Primary sources, are any source that come directly from the time period that is being studied. These include journal entries and nautical records. Artifacts are another type of source; these are objects from different time periods that reveal greater insights into the way people lived back then.
What is called the history not written down?
Oral Tradition is often referred to as history that has not been written down. Depending on the context, such as in cultural anthropology and archaeology classes, the term for history not written down can also be prehistory, assuming it covers a time period before there were written records. In still another context, such as when describing details of everyday life of past peoples, it can be called the unwritten history - because it was during the historic period, but was not considered significant enough for anyone to write down.
What language was the Anglo saxon chronicle written in?
The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle was written entirely in Old English, which is also called Anglo-Saxon.
How have legends helped the study of history?
In respect to Ancient History, but true also of other historical concerns and periods, legends have provided assistance in various ways to historical research and discovery. As just one example, legends have often revealed details about the daily lives and customs of ancient peoples, even when the core-story of the legend may be false.
How would ancient Asian travelers have been able to reach North America without boats?
The theory is that, peoples from Asia traveled across the Bering Land Bridge (now the Bering Straight) which was above ground in recent geological history (c. 15,000 years ago).
Why do historians study roman assemblies and senate?
Historians do this because it is their job. There are historians who specialise in the history of Rome, just as there are historians who specialise in the history of other peoples and other historical periods. They study all aspects of Roman history, not just the assemblies and the senate. The study of these two institution is part of getting an understanding of Roman politics and society.
What characteristics were widely shared by pastoral peoples?
mobile, relied on domesticated animals, and population much smaller than in agricultural societies
How does History view Douglas MacArthur?
well he is seen differently through peoples eyes. he is a hero because of the liberation of the Philippines, but it should be metioned he caused the Korean war's destructive outcome. many historians have mixxed feelings about him.
History of black peoples in Quatamala?
no
What groups played roles as intermediaries between civilizations in early global history?
Pastoral peoples played critical roles in establishing and expanding trading links . They brought protection from bandits and raiding parties for caravans passing through their grassing land if they returned with periodic payments, from merchants and imperial bureaucrats .
What did Martin loved?
history,peoples right, freedom
What reason is most cited by historians as the main downfall of the Roman Empire?
The inwards movement of Eurasian peoples who took it over.
What did Martin Luther love?
history,peoples right, freedom
How have recent historians changed the way people view history?
Historians of today and those of the past base their writings on many factors, one unfortunately is a bias they may or may not be aware of. One thing is a certainty, all historians have a cultural background that differs in many ways from one another. Clearly there will be different views of various past events depending on a variety of factors. Historians of today's Russia will have different views of the history of the Soviet Union, depending upon their political bias or lack of them. The ordinary person, one without a political or cultural bias will now as in the past, believe the "history" that best suits themselves. Of course, there is no consensus of how people of any particular period of time, viewed history. There are too many variables, too many different peoples, too many different time periods. What is clear today as it has always been, historians have written different versions of the same periods of time and events. There can be no proven way to determine if recent historians have changed the way people view history. This is true if only based on intellectual thought. There can be no "proof" for lack of a better term that anything has changed because the historians of today have the same views, accurate or inaccurate today as in the past. Any historian or student of history will agree to that,.
Do domestic pigs turn feral if released in the wild?
physically able pigs will automatically become feral if released or neglected, not necessarily in the wild, they can be in peoples backyards and parks and forests
What are the best books to read to get a good history of England?
"A History of the English-Speaking Peoples" by Winston Churchill ,
How does history change peoples cultures?
They're cultures is part of history. Therefor, not being able to change.
