High level languages are far more descriptive and, generally, more like a natural language. In my experience, it has been a lot easier to make a typo in a low level language because you are doing things like directly accessing memory locations and using registers for storage.
High level languages are far more descriptive and, generally, more like a natural language. In my experience, it has been a lot easier to make a typo in a low level language because you are doing things like directly accessing memory locations and using registers for storage.
yes i definetly think that high level language is better than low level language!!! because it provides a much user friendly environment and makes programmes easier to read and write...It also makes the program less error prone.. The speed of writing programs also becomes easy
high level language for embedded
Yes, it is a High-Level Language
Scheme is a functional programming language and a high level language.
high level language are easier to learn
high level language is converted to machine level language using a compiler or an interpreter
high level language; is a computer language that is near to human language. high level programming is a process of programming high level language.Example,c++,java,cobol are one of them. The reverse is true for the low level language.
Assembly languages allow complete control over the machine's instruction set. This means programs must be written in minute detail, in terms the machine itself can understand. It is tedious, prone to human error, and very difficult to maintain. High-level languages make use of high-level abstractions to select the appropriate machine instructions for us. That is, a single high-level statement can produce dozens of individual machine code instructions. This makes programming much easier; the more abstract the language, the easier it is to express solutions in terms a human can understand.
Yes, C++ is a high-level language.
Not necessarily. Any language with an object-oriented approach will be a high-level language, but a high-level language does not have to use an object-oriented approach.
A high level language naturally assumes the intentions of the programmer and thus blocks off many otherwise possible methods. For those that prefer to have a high level of control, a low level language is the obvious choice. The level of the language is inversely proportionate to the degree of control the programmer has. ie. low level language = high level of control, and vice versa.