0
What else can I help you with?
How conclusive is the evidence of DNA fingerprinting?
DNA fingerprinting is considered highly conclusive in identifying individuals due to the uniqueness of each person's DNA profile. The probability of two individuals having identical DNA fingerprints is extremely low, making it a powerful tool in forensic science. However, while it is highly reliable, factors such as sample contamination or improper handling can affect results. Overall, when conducted correctly, DNA fingerprinting provides strong, though not infallible, evidence for identification purposes.
How reliable is DNA fingerprinting?
It is not infallable, but it is considered reliable enough to be use as evidence.
Explain how a DNA fingerprinting produced?
In DNA fingerprinting, enzymes are used to cut the DNA in the smaple found at the crime scence
Why is DNA fingerprinting unreliable?
DNA fingerprinting is not as reliable as regular DNA profiling. Statistics show that about one out every 800,000 people have the same DNA fingerprint.
Fragments of DNA as a form of identification?
DNA fingerprinting
What is used to copy dna for dna fingerprinting?
Nuclear transfer
Is DNA fingerprinting worthy?
Yes, to make the world safer. DNA fingerprinting prevents identity theft and some corruptness.
What are the pros and cons of DNA fingerprinting?
me
Do Christans support DNA Fingerprinting?
I do
How are DNA fragments separated on DNA fingerprinting?
Gel electrophoresis
What is used for copying DNA for DNA fingerprinting?
Nuclear transfer
Can coding DNA type of genetic material be used for DNA fingerprinting?
Yes, coding DNA can be used for DNA fingerprinting. Coding DNA, which contains genes that encode for proteins, can contain genetic variations that are unique to each individual. These variations can be used as markers in DNA fingerprinting to identify individuals or determine relationships between individuals.
