Clothing was considered valuable in those days; the executed would have no need of clothing so it was considered plunder. Part of Jesus' sacrifice is the suffering he went through, including humiliation.
Jesus is stripped of His garments.
Most likely he did. The Roman punishment of crucifixion included nakedness as part of the punishment and humiliation. This is one of the reasons the women would have kept at a distance. The soldiers also cast lots for his garments.
The soldiers of the governor, (Matthew27.27 to 35).
No, they would not make something no one would wear. People of Jesus time were modest in their dress. They would weave garments in one entire piece, as was Jesus outer garment the Romans cast lots for, this type of garment was expensive.Orsew garments together fromsmaller sections of weaved material. They would be flowing garments to the ground, covering most of the body.
Palm branches and the peoples' outer garments (like cloaks).
There is no record in the Bible that I can remember of Jesus ripping his clothes. Only the soldiers which supervised his crucifixion, 'parted his garments', which may be interpreted as ripping; but Jesus said nothing.
In the King James version * Mat 27:35 And they crucified him, and parted his garments, casting lots: that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophet, They parted my garments among them, and upon my vesture did they cast lots. So, he was possibly naked.
what has 2 garments?
"Mormon Underwear" are also known as garments. These garments are worn by members of the LDS church who have entered the temple and made covenants with the Lord. The garments are a reminder and an outward expression of those covenants made with God. There are MANY LDS members who have never been through the temple but are still active members of the Church. No... "Mormon Underwear" or GARMENTS are NOT required to be a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints.
kappa garments
585 garments.
The Bible mentions only that his 'garments' were later divided, but probably it would have been some sort of robe as was the usual dress at the time.