It doesn't work like that.
Most of it is a desert.
it is a big country so not many people stay there
The least populated area of Australia would be almost anywhere in its deserts, which encompass most of the interior. Lack of fresh, drinkable water is the main reason for the absence of people.
Australia is the worlds smallest continent; however the least populated is Antarctica. Technically Australia is not an island. If it was, so would every other place in the world as everything is surrounded by water. Continents are not islands. The largest island in the world is Greenland.
Iceland was under Norway and then Denmark for a long time, so yes.
its under the equator and they have awesome accents
its the smallest continent and no contraversy exists so far and when talking about largest island, contraversy exists because "greenland" still exists and its not drowned in any kind of disaster or a tsunami........ i hope u got the answer.........
Why isn't it populated... that's the question...
Although Australia has a low population density and a relatively small population of about 22 million, most of the country is inhospitable desert, so most people tend to live in the small temperate areas along some of the coast. There is also not much water in Australia so much of the country is under water restrictions. There is a school of thought that due to Australia's climate, the long term maximum sustainable population levels should revert to World War 2 levels of 9 to 10 million.
Antarctica is not populated in the common sense of the statistical use of the word. People who live and work in Antarctic temporarily -- there is no permanent population -- do so under the support of their governments. All work is scientific and results in study of the health of planet eart.
It is the official HQ of the Church of Norway.
Because their climates are humid Continental and subarctic , and the physical feature is 656 Ft (200 meters) high in elevation.