0
- Scientists want to know more on how the world was created and some of them refuse to belive that God created the universe.
- God's existence is deemed by some to be illogical, as well as many beliefs of various religions. Science is the process of reaching something through logical conclusions. "Science" as a process of obtaining beliefs does not explicitly disprove God, but may imply that God does not exist. Some scientists may expound on this, and run experiments attempting to disprove God's existence.
- Science is about the physical world, while God or gods is a metaphysical concept. Science and metaphysics are like two parallel lines - they do not intersect. One can not prove or disprove the other.
- Science is not trying to prove that gods do or do not exist. Science is trying to discover the reason that the Universe works the way it does. As more and more of the mechanism becomes known, there seems to some to be less and less need for a god to fill in the unknown parts. This is similar to the way that the early mapmakers filled in the unknown regions of the world with warnings like "Here be monsters" which are now removed and replaced with oceans and land and real world items.
Science is not trying to prove anything about God.
Rather, facts and processes are discovered, and theories and postulates are published, not all of them proven. That's all.
Directly or implicitly based upon all this, it is the public and the scientists (not science itself), who each form their own conclusion about the existence of God. There are a good number of highly-placed scientists who believe in God, while many others do not.
Science and religion need not be in conflict. If you believe that God formed our world slowly through old-Earth Creationism, or if you scientifically determine that young-Earth Creationism is the most logical origin for the universe, your belief in God and your scientific knowledge can actually support each other.
Many think that science, and specifically Evolution, have proved that there is no God. They don't comprehend that even if Evolution was an unquestionable fact, it would not automatically follow that God isn't there. They also may be unaware that there are some highly-qualified scientists who do not believe in Evolution.
Wiki User
∙ 6y ago
Wiki User
∙ 6y agoThey need not be in conflict. If you believe that God formed our world slowly through old-Earth Creationism, or if you scientifically determine that young-Earth Creationism is the most logical origin for the universe, your belief in God and your scientific knowledge can actually support each other.
Many think that science, and specifically Evolution, have proved that there is no God. They don't comprehend that even if Evolution was an unquestionable fact, it would not automatically follow that God isn't there. They also may be unaware that there are some highly-qualified scientists who do not believe in Evolution.
See also the Related Links.
Link: Can you show that God exists
Link: God's wisdom seen in His creations
Wiki User
∙ 6y agoThe simple answer is that science is not trying to prove or disprove that there is a god. It is a topic of no importance. Rather, facts and processes are discovered, and theories and postulates are published, not all of them proven. That's all.
The facts science determines and provides a real word explanation for the superstitious beliefs of many religions is almost incidental. Once there is a provable cause there is no need for magic.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why did god make stuff that proves hes not real Like science?
There is no proof that God made stuff to prove that he is not real, including science.
What was the Darwin's plan?
He was trying to prove that their was no god , and basically every thing was science ;) , hope it helped you
What was C.S. Lewis trying to achieve?
he was at first trying to convince the world that god didn't exist.then he was convinced that god is real(wich he is) and then he started writing books to try prove that god is real
Why is there no way to prove if gods real but a way to get to the moon?
Because we know the moon is real, we have the technology to get there, god on the other hand is not real and there is no way to prove that he is real, it's like trying to prove the tooth fairy is real
How can you prove to your friend that God is the real god?
Numerous arguments have been put forward and tested over the centuries, to prove that God is real. In each case and in each class of such arguments, there have been found to be fatal flaws in the argument. It is not possible to prove that God is real. You have your faith and your friend believes otherwise.
Why can't science prove god?
No one can prove God, he is thing, idea, life form beyond human understanding. We can not begin to understand him, so how can one prove him? We can't.
What is a good christian earth science project?
Prove that god exists
Science of god?
Some science suggests that a god may exist. However there is still no proof to prove that god does exist. Actually, there's no proof to prove that science exists either, but don't let that bother you. Just take our word for it. Would we get something this important wrong?
What is it when you believe in god and science?
Believing in God is a superstition you do not need to belive in science it is up to yourself to prove any conclusions you come up with. The statement is flawed if you accept science you would not accept god - in the sense of an etheral being
Do we have scientific proff of the existence of God?
Science doesn’t have the processes to prove or disprove the existence of God. Science studies and attempts to explain only the natural world while God, in most religions, is supernatural.
Is there scientific information that proves God exists?
I don't think there is. Science can only prove what can be observed.
Why do science and scientists not believe in God?
The purpose of science is not to deny the existence of God, and a scientist is not an atheist by definition. Answer:Metaphysics is not the province of science, science deals with the real world . The purpose of science is to break down barriers to knowledge and utilize that knowledge to further mankind's understanding of the Universe. If science could prove (or disprove) the existence of god(s) the results would be unsatisfactory to all theists concerned. A proof that there was no god(s) would either not be accepted or cause the disappearance of religion. A proof that there was a god(s) would show that the god(s) are subject to the physical rules of the universe and subject to the scientists' tests. In either of these cases the god(s) would not be omnipotent or above everything, which would make them just another real world phenomenon, not supernatural.
