People say that Wikipedia is an unreliable source because anyone can change what it says, however, if moderators catch someone making a stupid edit, they will return the text to it's original so Wikipedia is a reliable source.
Some people - including the editors of Wikipedia itself - consider it somewhat unreliable because it derives from other sources of information. For serious investigations, you should go to the primary sources of information.Wikipedia is, however, a great way to get introductory information about some topic, for instance, about scientific topics.
Because anyone can write about topics and some people may be purposely trying to give incorrect or reliable information or they might think that what they are saying is right but its not.
an unrealiable samurai
wow this website is so unrealiable
source wikipedia
only one character
Wikipedia is a tertiary source (which is a document that exists to serve as an index of primary sources). According to Wikipedia, "As tertiary sources, encyclopedias and textbooks attempt to summarize and consolidate the source materials into an overview, but may also present subjective commentary and analysis (which are characteristics of a secondary source)."
It is pronounced al-SIB-ee-uh-deez.
Not necessarily, articles on Wikipedia are edited by other users and the information they put may not be from a reliable source, or sometimes it may not be from a source at all. So, Wikipedia isn't your most reliable source because they answers they have may not be right all the time.
Not necessarily, articles on Wikipedia are edited by other users and the information they put may not be from a reliable source, or sometimes it may not be from a source at all. So, Wikipedia isn't your most reliable source because they answers they have may not be right all the time.
Source- wikipedia.
1955....source wikipedia
yes they are source wikipedia
It was publushed in 1820. Source: wikipedia