Wikipedia is a tertiary source (which is a document that exists to serve as an index of primary sources).
According to Wikipedia, "As tertiary sources, encyclopedias and textbooks attempt to summarize and consolidate the source materials into an overview, but may also present subjective commentary and analysis (which are characteristics of a secondary source)."
No, it is generally not recommended to cite Wikipedia as a source in a research paper because it is not considered a reliable or scholarly source.
It is generally not acceptable to cite Wikipedia as a source in a research paper because it is not considered a reliable or scholarly source.
source wikipedia
ParakasariCapital- Thanjavur(Parakasari is near the Bay of Bengal)(Source: Wikipedia, Type Vijayalaya Chola)
Not necessarily, articles on Wikipedia are edited by other users and the information they put may not be from a reliable source, or sometimes it may not be from a source at all. So, Wikipedia isn't your most reliable source because they answers they have may not be right all the time.
Not necessarily, articles on Wikipedia are edited by other users and the information they put may not be from a reliable source, or sometimes it may not be from a source at all. So, Wikipedia isn't your most reliable source because they answers they have may not be right all the time.
yes they are source wikipedia
Genoa. Source Wikipedia
Source- wikipedia.
It was publushed in 1820. Source: wikipedia
1955....source wikipedia
Hollywood Source: Wikipedia