nascent hydrogen is much more reactive than ordinary hydrogen because it is produced in situ,itmeans that as it is produced it is consumed in another reaction. It is unstable that is why much more reactive than atomic hydrogen.
nascent hydrogen is much more reactive than ordinary hydrogen because it is produced in situ,itmeans that as it is produced it is consumed in another reaction. It is unstable that is why much more reactive than atomic hydrogen.
Atomic hydrogen is considered a stronger reducing agent than nascent hydrogen because it exists in a highly reactive state due to its unpaired electron, which readily participates in chemical reactions. Nascent hydrogen, on the other hand, refers to hydrogen in a very short-lived and reactive form generated during certain chemical processes, but it is not as fundamentally reactive as atomic hydrogen. The greater stability and reactivity of atomic hydrogen make it more effective in reducing other substances.
Scientifically, nascent refers to a substance at the point at which it forms. In a chemical reaction, such as zinc reacting with sulphuric acid, individual hydrogen atoms will form but VERY quickly react with another atom to give H2 molecules. This is the only common situation in which atomic hydrogen exists, even if very fleetingly.
Well, honey, fluorine is more reactive than hydrogen because it's got more baggage in its atomic structure. With its smaller atomic size and higher electronegativity, fluorine is like a drama queen looking for trouble, while hydrogen is just trying to keep a low profile. So, when it comes to chemistry, fluorine is the one causing all the commotion while hydrogen is just minding its own business.
Hydrogen gas at standard temperature and pressure exists as diatomic molecules, and much of the chemical potential energy of atomic hydrogen has been evolved as heat along with forming the diatomic molecules.
Potassium is more reactive than hydrogen. It is a highly reactive metal that reacts violently with water, while hydrogen is a nonmetal gas that is generally unreactive unless under specific conditions.
The reaction to demonstrate that nascent hydrogen is a more powerful reducing agent than molecular hydrogen typically involves its ability to reduce metal ions in solution. For example, when nascent hydrogen is generated in situ (e.g., by reacting zinc with hydrochloric acid), it can readily reduce copper(II) ions (Cu²⁺) to copper metal (Cu). In contrast, molecular hydrogen (H₂) does not effectively reduce Cu²⁺ under similar conditions, showcasing the enhanced reactivity of nascent hydrogen compared to its molecular form. This difference is attributed to the higher energy and reactivity of nascent hydrogen due to its formation during chemical reactions.
dont know what kind of a comparision you are looking for but simply: Hydrogen has an atomic weight of 1.008 and sodium has an atomic weight of 22.99. the symbols are H for hydrogen and Na for sodium
Hydrogen is more reactive than Copper, but less reactive than Zinc which is less reactive than Magnesium which is less reactive than Potassium. Potassium is the most reactive of all, relatively speaking.
No, copper is less reactive than hydrogen. Copper is a relatively unreactive metal, while hydrogen is a highly reactive non-metal. Copper typically does not react with most acids or oxygen in the air, while hydrogen can easily react with many elements and compounds.
sodium, calcium, magnesium, aluminium, zinc, iron, tin and led are metals more reactive than hydrogen.
Elemental hydrogen and helium have atomic masses less than twice their atomic numbers.