The Bohr's atom model is still used because of its simplicity, and its correct results for selected systems. The Bohr model is still taught to introduce students to quantum mechanics or energy level diagrams.
The Bohr model of the atom defines specific radiai that the electrons can orbit the nucleus at. Quantum theory has led to the development of the concept of orbitals, areas that the electron is most likely to be found at as defined by its schrodinger equation.
Bohr model was incorrect because the model did not account for the elements with more than one electron. It proved success for only when dealing with the Hydrogen atom because it only had one electron. Every elements with more than one electrons and thus different and higherquantum energy levels could not be used in the fixed model of Bohr's/
His model was not accepted because it only worked for the Hydrogen atom, which has only 1 electron. It wouldn't for any other atoms because they have more than 1 electron, and we do not know the direct paths the electrons follow.
Hopes this helps
Actually, it DID work -- but (basically) only for hydrogen. It successful predicted that element's spectral lines. However, it failed to be useful for any other non-ionized elements.
There is no N in Bohrs. But his first name was Neils
Incorrect nowadays.
It does not. Cell theory is fully compatible with evolutionary theory. Does this mean we know everything about the evolution of cells? No. We say we do not know, not that cell theory shows that evolutionary theory is incorrect. ( except, of course, if you are referring to heritability. This Darwin got wrong, but this is not directly related to cell theory )
If a scientist were being modest, then yes. But a true theory is backed up by scientific data and observation. So your answer is Incorrect.
the planetary model
There is no N in Bohrs. But his first name was Neils
Incorrect nowadays.
god
is probably an incorrect theory
Caloric theory.
If all the evidence taken into consideration can be explained by the scientific model proposed and the model successfully predicts outcomes of experiments yet to be performed, it is a "good scientific theory" It still can be incorrect. If it is proven incorrect it should be abandoned.
It does not. Cell theory is fully compatible with evolutionary theory. Does this mean we know everything about the evolution of cells? No. We say we do not know, not that cell theory shows that evolutionary theory is incorrect. ( except, of course, if you are referring to heritability. This Darwin got wrong, but this is not directly related to cell theory )
yes it can
yes you can, in theory. But it is very difficult to change an established 'ruling paradigm' (however incorrect).
When there wrong about there theory. Like for example , if a scientist creates a new theory, but research proved it incorrect.
lemarck ideas of evolution are known as the inheritance of acquire characteristic what was incorrect about his theory of how organisms evole
Yes because he publicised his ideas well. He knew people in journals, wrote a lot and spoke to lots of people to persuade him of his ideas.