If all the evidence taken into consideration can be explained by the scientific model proposed and the model successfully predicts outcomes of experiments yet to be performed, it is a "good scientific theory" It still can be incorrect. If it is proven incorrect it should be abandoned.
Putting it simply, theories and ideas are not proven scientific facts, but remain as such, an idea or a theory which have yet still to be proven.
A scientific theory is an experiment that still needs to be tested, but is believed to be true. A hypothesis is a fact and data based guess as to what the result(s) of an experiment will be. A scientific law is proven to be true and states that the results of the experiment will always be the same, and needs no further testing. An example of a scientific theory is the cell theory, which states that all living things are composed of at least one cell and that cells come from other cells.
Darwin's original theory was formulated over 150 years ago. The modern theory of evolution, while still basically the same as Darwin's, is also significantly different. In either case, there is no scientific alternative to the origin of biodiversity.This is equivalent to how there is no scientific alternative to Atomic Theory.
A well-supported hypothesis is a theory that appears to have a lot of evidence behind it. This evidence helps to make it seem likely that the hypothesis is true, but it is still just a theory until it has been proven.
It is a theory because it is a comprehensive, well-supported model explaining a well-defined set of independently verifiable observations in an independently verifiable and falsifiable manner.
I guess it's because science today doesn't know everything we will ever know and there are still discoveries to be made which might change what we believe to be fact.
Gravity is considered a theory rather than a fact because it is a scientific explanation that has been extensively tested and supported by evidence, but it is still subject to refinement and further study. Theories in science are not considered absolute truths, but rather the best explanations based on current knowledge and evidence.
Cell theory cannot be changed to cell law because they are two different concepts. Cell theory is a collection of scientific principles that describe the basic properties of cells, while cell law does not exist as a recognized scientific concept.
A colloquial theory is an evolved form of a hypothesis that links facts together. The difference between this and a scientific theory, however, is that a colloquial theory still implies some doubt and speculation.
Putting it simply, theories and ideas are not proven scientific facts, but remain as such, an idea or a theory which have yet still to be proven.
A scientific theory is an experiment that still needs to be tested, but is believed to be true. A hypothesis is a fact and data based guess as to what the result(s) of an experiment will be. A scientific law is proven to be true and states that the results of the experiment will always be the same, and needs no further testing. An example of a scientific theory is the cell theory, which states that all living things are composed of at least one cell and that cells come from other cells.
Darwin's original theory was formulated over 150 years ago. The modern theory of evolution, while still basically the same as Darwin's, is also significantly different. In either case, there is no scientific alternative to the origin of biodiversity.This is equivalent to how there is no scientific alternative to Atomic Theory.
Tectonic plate movement is still considered a theory because it is a well-substantiated explanation based on evidence and scientific reasoning. In science, a theory is an explanation that has been thoroughly tested and supported by numerous observations and experiments, and the theory of plate tectonics has provided valuable insights into the Earth's geological processes.
Evolution is a widely accepted scientific theory, but it is still a theory. It cannot be absolutely proven, it can only be supported by evidence.There are unknown facts about the theory, such as how/where the first cell(s) originated.
A scientific theory is a hypothesis that has been repeatedly tested and still seems to be valid. These theories are tested by using the scientific method.
Its ability to be tested repeatably against the evidence, knowledge and techniques currently available, and give consistent results. It is still open to change or rejection, or indeed acceptance as scientific law, if advancing knowledge deems so.
There are many examples and applications when talking about scientific management theories that still linger around in today's organizations. The main one mentioned in a lot of organizations still is called F.W. Taylor's scientific management theory.