Gravity is considered a theory rather than a fact because it is a scientific explanation that has been extensively tested and supported by evidence, but it is still subject to refinement and further study. Theories in science are not considered absolute truths, but rather the best explanations based on current knowledge and evidence.
Gravity is an established scientific fact, not just a theory. It is a fundamental force that governs the interactions of objects in the universe, as confirmed by numerous experiments and observations.
Gravity is an established scientific fact, not just a theory. It is a fundamental force that governs the interactions of objects in the universe, as confirmed by numerous experiments and observations.
Perhaps the most well known fact about Albert Einstein is that his Theory of Relativity indicates that mass and energy are related to each other through the formula E=MC squared.
Well, first of all, your question is awkward, because "theory" doesn't mean "not fact".Newton's law of universal gravitation can't be proven, but it's a very very very verysuccessful theory, in many ways.-- When you take Newton's formula for gravity, and use calculus and geometryto stroke it and squeeze it and massage it and roll it around in your hands, ittells you what the shape and size of planetary orbits must be, and how theplanets must move in their orbits . . . and then when you measure the realmotions of the real planets, you find that they actually move as the formulafor gravity says they should.-- When you take Newton's formula for gravity and use it to program the maneuversof a TV satellite, a moon landing, and a space probe to Pluto, those things work justas you want them to.None of this "proves" that the formula for gravity is correct in every possible way.But so far, for more than 300 years, it has been the best formula we have, as long aswe don't try to use it for things that are very very tiny ... like smaller than atoms.
It is called a theory out of convention. Some biologists refer to it as Darwin's Law of Evolution, because it is pretty well established. In science, a theory is any well substantiated explanation for some aspect of the world. That is why we have Newton's theory of gravity, and Einstein's even better theory of gravity (General Relativity). Evolution is both a well established fact (it has been observed, and it explains the sequence and arrangement of the fossil record), as well as a scientific theory (descent with modification, or random mutations coupled with natural selection, or that most modern (and extinct) species share common ancestry. Evolution is a fact, not a theory. How it proceeds are the various theories. When people use the term 'theory of evolution' they are generally, referring to Darwins theory of how evolution progresses. Which is through natural selection. That is a theory not evolution.
Gravity is an established scientific fact, not just a theory. It is a fundamental force that governs the interactions of objects in the universe, as confirmed by numerous experiments and observations.
Gravity is an established scientific fact, not just a theory. It is a fundamental force that governs the interactions of objects in the universe, as confirmed by numerous experiments and observations.
theory
The theory of gravity is very, very old, in fact Plato was discussing it. However, it was Newton who formulated the theory of universal gravity, that the same "force" that causes things to fall to the floor keeps planets in orbit around the sun.
The best way to respond to this is to explain that there is the fact of evolution and the theory of evolution. Evolution is defined as genetic change within a population. This is an easily observable fact both in nature and the laboratory. The theory of evolution is an explanation for the diversity of life on earth based on the observable facts that evolution does indeed occur. It is exactly the same situation with gravity. Gravity is a fact, an easily observed physical phenomenon. But there is also a Theory of Gravitation, an explanation for the phenomenon itself and how it works. That there is a theory for both evolution and gravity does not mean the facts of evolution and gravity are any less true.
Evolution is a scientific theory that is supported by overwhelming evidence from various fields such as paleontology, genetics, and microbiology. The term "theory" in science does not mean a guess, but rather a well-substantiated explanation based on evidence. While evolution is widely accepted among scientists, it is not considered a fact in the same way as established scientific laws because theories are subject to modification based on new evidence.
No he was never considered strict, in fact he was rather timid.
Scientists do not prove things but the theory of evolution by natural selection has over 150 years of evidence supporting it and is considered a very certain theory and quite beyond reasonable doubt. As well accepted as the theory of gravity, atomic theory and the heliocentric theory. I suggest you review the primary meaning of scientific theory in a good dictionary.
Evolution is widely accepted by the scientific community because it is supported by mountains of evidence from various fields like genetics, paleontology, and biochemistry. It is considered a scientific theory, which means it is a well-substantiated explanation based on evidence. Biblical Creation, on the other hand, is a belief based on religious texts rather than empirical evidence, and therefore is not considered a scientific explanation.
In science, a theory is something that is not fully proven, but has strong supporting evidence. Some common theories that are well known, and seen by most people as fact include; Evolution, Plate Tectonics, and Gravity. All three of these have enough evidence to be scientifically sound, but we have not yet given 100% proof to turn them from scientific theory into scientific law.
Yes, a statement can be considered an opinion if it expresses a personal belief or viewpoint rather than a fact that can be proven.
They didn't; the big bang theory is just an idea or a theory, not a fact. The empirical evidence that our Universe was, 13.7 billion years ago, much more dense that it is now, is overwhelming. No other explanation even begins to explain what we observe in our Universe. Saying the Big Bang is a "just an idea or theory" is like saying gravity is "just an idea or a theory, not a fact."