Want this question answered?
Carbon14 dating (isotopic dating)
Yes, but the dating is only off a little (500 years or so).
Carbon dating
Relative dating is not more accurate than absolute dating. Relative dating will, if done properly, give you an order sequence in time but it will not return any information about when something happened unless there is other information that can be used to establish a time frame.
Which of these dating methods is capable of giving the most accurate age of an artifact?
Too little carbon-14 remains after 50,000 years
Carbon14 dating (isotopic dating)
The main limitations of using Carbon14 dating to find the age of something that is carbon base are firstly the possibility that carbon may be absorbed by some things making it more difficult to get an absolutely accurate age and secondly, with Carbon14 only having a half life of 5,568 years the maximum theoretical limit for detection is 100,000 years.
Yes, but the dating is only off a little (500 years or so).
radiocarbon dating
The half life of C14 is about 5700 years, so items that are a few multiples of this time are suitable for carbon14 dating. Most archaeological items are suitable, and some young fossils.
Relatively young organic materials
No, it is a method of dating materials that is very accurate.
Carbon dating and radioactive dating are more effective, assuming those arn't the same thing. =]
Carbon dating
Carbon Dating.
Carbon dating