Viruses are considered to be non-living and because they are not alive, they can not reproduce. A better term is to replicate or make a copy of themselves. It is like using a copy machine.
it is not made of cells (A+)
no metabolism
because all right
A virus is considered non-living. It does not have all the characteristics of a living thing unlike bacteria. Viruses need living cells to reproduce while any living things can reproduce (asexually or not).
Bacteria. A virus is a non-living thing. Bacteria is a living thing.
There are virus's that chickens get, yes. I am not aware of a virus called "chicken virus" unless you are referring to "chicken pox". There is "chicken anaemia virus" or CAV but it's not very common nowadays due to better vaccinations.
A virus is an example of an entity that can cause sickness by invading your body, but it is not considered a living thing because it cannot replicate or carry out metabolic processes on its own.
HIV is a virus, and since viruses require another organism to carry out the functions that would classify it as a living organism, it's considered "dead," that is until it finds a host.
Virus cannot considered living. They lack cellular organization
They have no metabolism, no cellular structure, and can not reproduce without a host cell. They are considered to straddle the line between "life" and "nonlife".
b
DNA is the fundamental living matter. A virus, considered to be a living matter consists of core of DNA. When this virus invades a Bacterial cell, it forms the Bacteriophase.DNA is the fundamental living matter. A virus, considered to be a living matter consists of core of DNA. When this virus invades a Bacterial cell, it forms the Bacteriophase.