Erosion is bad for animal life, since silt gets into rivers, making them dirty and bad to drink, and also if there is erosion, that means there aren't a lot of plants, which means not a lot of habitat/food.
It depends who they lived with. If they had a good owner there life would be good but if they had a bad owner there life would be bad and it depends on what kind of animal.
Realy bad
...Cycle of life
Cloning an animal can be bad for the environment. This is because it messes with the natural cycle of life and most cloned animals come out with defects.
it is believed that if you were a perfect person, you would spend the after life in the form of a human. if you led a bad life, you spend the after life as an animal. this encourages people to be as good people as possible.
Some bad things about animal cloning is that it messes with nature and the life cycle. It also can harm the original organism and create mutants.
Soil from the rainforest is typically rich in nutrients due to the decomposing plant and animal matter. This makes it ideal for supporting diverse plant and animal life. However, the soil is also highly vulnerable to erosion and degradation when the forest is cleared for agriculture or logging, leading to long-term environmental consequences.
After you die, if you have a happy life, you come back as a human. But if you have a bad life you come back as an animal.
The bad effects of soil erosion are: loss of productive land, loss of topsoil, and increased risk of flooding.
yeaaa every animal is important to the circle of life
Yes. Depending on how bad the abuse is you can get two years to life in prison.
BOTH!