Viruses have no self metabolism nor ability to reproduce autonomously, but bacteria can reproduce, grow and metabolize without the help of another cell.
An easy way to think about it is this: If all life in the Universe were to die, but bacteria were left in tact (alive), they would survive and continue to live and reproduce. If bacteria were wiped out as well as all other life, but viruses were unaffected (left in tact), they would all disintegrate/decay (fall apart) fairly quickly and there is no conceivable way they could reproduce.
This is because the virus isn't alive, it is just a collection of molecules that living things will "copy" (reproduce) if they come into contact with them, due to the particular interactions the living cell has with those viral molecules.
Viruses are considered as a link between living organisms and non-living things because they contain nucleic acids (DNA & RNA) enveloped by a protein coat like living organisms also they have a crystalline form out of the living tissues like non-living things
a virus isn't classified as a living cell but bacteria is because bacteria has a cell wall and large molecules inside of them that viruses don't.
they are not made up of cells
To be able to study all the living things in our universe, we need a way to group or classify them together. Scientists divided all things into living and non-living. Then they divided those (e.g. animal kindom and plant kingdom, then continued dividing them on how the items were seimilar or dissimilar).
scientist classify parts of an ecosystem by biotic things (living things) and abiotic things ( nonliving things).
Are you sure this is true? Because if it is then other stuff will happen.
Bacteria are able to reproduce on their own while viruses need a host to "hijack" so they can reproduce. Bacteria have metabolisms, catabolic and anabolic biochemical reactions going on in their cells all the time. Viruses do not. Bacteria can grow in size to a certain extent while viruses do not change in this regard. The definition of living things classify bacteria as a living thing, while viruses are not.
Living things eat, breathe, sleep, drink water and produce offspring. Non-living things do not do any of these things. Non-living things are rocks, sand, air and water.
Scientists classify living things because then it's easier to share information, study, & discuss these living things.
Biotic is a term that is used by science to classify living things.
Aristotle
Np
Binomial nomenclature.
To be able to study all the living things in our universe, we need a way to group or classify them together. Scientists divided all things into living and non-living. Then they divided those (e.g. animal kindom and plant kingdom, then continued dividing them on how the items were seimilar or dissimilar).
ugly
micro organisms
scientist classify parts of an ecosystem by biotic things (living things) and abiotic things ( nonliving things).
Viruses are not living things. Viruses are complicated assemblies of molecules, including proteins, nucleic acids, lipids, and carbohydrates, but on their own they can do nothing until they enter a living cell. Without cells, viruses would not be able to multiply. Therefore, viruses are not living things.
Are you sure this is true? Because if it is then other stuff will happen.
well, to classify living things scientists use a dichotomous key. A dichotomous key is a key which is sort of like a family tree, the key is split into two branches. di means 2.sometimes scientists use other keys to classify living thing. hope this helped.