Because it is an occasion that is among the saddest in the lives of the family and loved ones attending the funeral. They are suffering grief and mourning, and need an environment of peace and quiet. They are hurt and insulted by the disruption of a protest by strangers who have no interest in the ceremony, and who wish only to inflict pain on the bereaved.
she was at the private funeral but not he public funeral
Shirley Temple's funeral will be a private one for friends and family only.
Bernie Mack's funeral is Friday, August 15, 2008. This is suppose to be a private funeral.
Far enough away that those at the funeral cant hear or see you. I know that in my own case, if protestors are anywhere in sight or sound of me at any funeral (especially family) I will be very very much engaged in getitng rid of them right then. Yes they have the right to protest.. but it doesnt matter, its a very evil thing for that church to do protests at a funeral.
Obama doesn't have a funeral plan. He is a private citizen now and would pay for his funeral.
yes but in private
They have the 1st amendment right to protest on public property, so your answer is yes. Even though they do have the right it seems as if they are not respecting the family of the fallen solider in their protest at the funeral.
private death ---> private funeral see if he had shot himself in public then it would be a public funeral...hopefully with an open casket :) have a nice day
Her funeral was a private, family service. The names of the attendees is not public.
No, he was not invited to either the public memorial or the private funeral.
Yes of course there is.
It is unknown because the family had the funeral private at the Beverly Wiltshire hotel.