It is important for a scientist to be open minded but skeptical so that he/she will gather the information on a direct observation instead of on a feeling.
"The people were skeptical when the scientist told them that his son was taken by extraterrestrials."
It is important because you cant always agree with people you have to sometimes disagree with people and open your mind which meaning let people know what your thinking and your ideas
The definition of skeptical is “Unbelievable” or “Doubtful”
It's SKEPTICAL. Here are some sentences.I'm skeptical about your ability to use the spell-check program.He gave me a skeptical glance.She has a skeptical attitude toward everything.
because sometimes scientist can can create them but the experiment goes wrong so it's important to recreated so they can fix their mistake
"The people were skeptical when the scientist told them that his son was taken by extraterrestrials."
Because it is a corporations nature to lie.
Reasoning Creativity Skeptical Openness
he was openminded
It is important because you cant always agree with people you have to sometimes disagree with people and open your mind which meaning let people know what your thinking and your ideas
They are skeptical, but cautiously optimistic. If it pans out, it could go far toward unraveling no few thorny conundra.
Because scientists have an inquiring mind and believe in the scientific method - anything is possible.
A scientist may be a teacher as well. Both are mostly important.
The definition of skeptical is “Unbelievable” or “Doubtful”
of course it is important because a scientist can't work if he is not patient
A person who does charity work is compassionate, empathetic, and generous. They are altruistic individuals who selflessly give their time, resources, and efforts to help those in need without expecting anything in return.
There are various reasons. Here are some:They might be skeptical of the reliability or truth of what other scientists have claimed.They might be trying to understand the earlier results better.They might be hoping to extend the other scientist's results.They might be trying to determine whether there are limits to the applicability of the other scientist's results.