answersLogoWhite

0


Want this question answered?

Be notified when an answer is posted

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why is it important for scientists to use more than one source of evidence tosupport evolutionary relationships?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Natural Sciences
Related questions

What impression does the speaker of the poem have the personhe or she speaking tosupport your answer?

The speaker conveys a sense of admiration and reverence towards the person they are addressing in the poem. This is indicated by the use of respectful language, imagery, or tone that showcases the speaker's deep regard for the individual. The speaker may also express gratitude or affection towards the person, reflecting a positive and appreciative relationship between them.


How do you write a debate speech for 3rd speaker?

Third Affirmative Speaker Template 31. Good afternoon Mr/MadamChairman, Ladies and Gentlemen.(Use Madam or Mr depending onthe gender of the Chairman.)2. The topic for our debate isTeam line...REBUTTAL4. The first negative speaker hastried to tell you (During the debatewrite on your rebuttal card whatyour opposition's first speaker hassaid.)5. This is wrong because (During thedebate write a reason why whatyour opposition's first speaker hassaid is wrong. If you have somemore points then list them as well.)6. The second negative speakerhas tried to tell you (During thedebate write what youropposition's second speaker hassaid.)7. This is wrong because (During thedebate write a reason why whatyour opposition's second speakerhas said is wrong. If you have somemore points list them as well.)SUMMARYAs third speaker it is your job tosummarise your case. You do thisby listing the points of your first andsecond speaker.8. Our first speaker spoke to youabout(List your first speaker's firstargument. Include a reason tosupport this argument.)9. S/he also spoke about (List yourfirst speaker's second argument.Include a reason to support thisargument.)10. Our second speaker told youthat (List your second speaker's firstargument. Include reasons tosupport this argument.)11. S/he also said that. (List yoursecond speaker's secondargument. Include reasons tosupport this argument.12.Make sure that you haveincluded all your side's argumentsand reasons.ENDING13. So Mr/Madam Chairman, Ladiesand Gentlemen, in conclusion ourteam(As the final speaker for yourside it is important to end yourdebating with a really compellinginfluential and powerful statement.)


What did Muslim league demand in 1940?

... under the leadership of Muhammad Ali Jinnah , it had gained such power that, for the first time, it demanded the establishment of a Muslim state (Pakistan), despite the opposition of the Indian National Congress


What evidence is there that radiowaves have the character of a wave?

In experimental configuration, radio signals exhibit refraction, reflection, dispersion,constructive and destructive interference ... all easily explained with reference to waves.Also, a lot of wave-math in the 1860s and 70s accurately predicted how radio would behavebefore the first signals were ever generated.Of course, none of that proves anything, and the conjecture is still "just a theory".All of those accurate predictions and consistent experimental results sure seem tosupport the hypothesis that radio signals travel in the form of waves, but if you offera different explanation tomorrow that more accurately describes how they behave, thenthe wave theory will be thrown out, and your explanation will become the preferredhypothesis.Nothing can 'prove' the theory in a thousand years, but a new explanation can disprove itin a month. That's how science works.


Was Orville Wright Autistic?

Although there is no way of really knowing, I believe there is strong evidence tosupport the ideathat he was on the mild high-functioning end of the spectrum, sometimes referred to asAsperger's Syndrome. I've researched the Wright brothers over a number of years (as an enthusiast, not as a scholar) and only after having an autistic child myself did Inotice similar behavior patterns between my son andbothOrville and WilburWright. These patterns include an intense fixation on a special interest, self-focus, lack of social "filters," inability to differentiate between social contexts, social anxieties and an affinity for machines, science and engineering. Biographers have also dubbed them as "woman-shy," and as writer John Elder Robison suggests, Aspies tend to have a fear of rejection by the opposite sex. Robison's memoir"Look Me in the Eye: My Life with Asperger's"offers excellent insight from the point of view of someone with Asperger's and heseemed (to me)to havemany of the same personal qualities that defined the Wrights.


What is the job of a halfback in Football commonly known as holding midfielder?

the job of a halfback is to defend the goals and pass it up to the forwards so they can score a goal.do you mean right back the defensive part, if this is right then maybe i could tell u more about it cause I'm a RB , you will need to support the right midfielder from the flanks and you could sometimes cross from the flanks if you have the chance to assist the other player and the same you will need tosupport your centre defense and prevent the opposition attackers to attack from the flanks, that's all,this is a historical formation since most national teams play 4-4-2 variations or at most 4-3-3 but in England the terms were still used up through the 1960sin the 1925-era arsenal team a halfback would be a tradtional number 6 or 4, they would play in front of a back line of 3 including a withdrawn center-half who functions as a stopper. ultimately, it is a four-man midfield, sort of square-shaped, with the two halfbacks as mentioned and at least one if not two withdrawn or deep inside forwards (traditional number 10 or 8). the attack consisted of a center forward and two wingers or wing halves. so you're looking at 3-3-4 or a 3-2-2-3 if both inside forwards are withdrawn.so, to answer you question, (finally!) the halfback would of course like all players now and then in the middle third of the pitch, link the defense and attack--full of running and passing. defending wise, this era does a lot of man-marking so i would say it would depend on the opposition. but since most other teams either played 3-3-4 or 2-3-5 the halfback would not pick up the winger except in certain parts of the pitch but most likely they would mark the other team's inside forwards.the old "halfback" is now part of a ususally 4-man midfield, frequently diamond-shaped (France 98), with hardly any wide players of kind before the 66 world cup.>>In attack, often drops back deep to receive pass from defenders and begin an attack. Drops back a little to act as a defensive insurance allowing the full backs to attack further up the pitch.In defense, breaks down the opposition's play and limits the impact of the opponent's playmaker


Do sociopaths ever speak about what is going on within?

Here's three:umm... i kindof am one... just so y'all know, it's not so muchfun being one either. i read that sentence, "Incapable of realhuman attachment to another." i don't even know what that is, i see it,i approximate it... it's like being outside a door looking through adirty window and watching re-runs of people I've seen in love or withchildren or with friends, and scratching, sometimes banging at theglass to get in and... nothing. I'm fond of people in every sense ofthe word, their little quirks and habits, the way they see life, exceptif they went away it wouldn't bother me much other than finding someoneelse to be fond of. i don't have friends, i only date military menbecause they're ok with only having a girlfriend for a couple monthsand i tell them in advance i won't wait for them... i don't know whatelse to do to limit the damage i inflict on others just as a result ofthem knowing me, short of moving to the mountains... but i still movebetween 2-5 times a year :( it's kindof hard walking around knowingi'll never have what i see making other people so happy and runningwhen i can tell someone is getting close just because i don't want tohurt them more later down the road... i'd like it alot to settle down,i WANT to be able to feel more with people, but it's hard to miss whatyou never had. i want what i THINK it would feel like... it'd be easyto give in and let someone stay because I'm so lonely... but hey, i'vewritten enough, just know i try to be a responsible little sociopath, iwon't ever get married or have kids, i practice safe sex, i won't stayin one city for long... everything you all take for granted i willnever let myself have just because i WANT to take it for granted. beinglike this won't go away so hopefully i can limit the amount of hatethrown my way by limiting my interaction with people, i don't know whatelse to do. and you all might not belive this, but i am sorry,hopefully i can speak for the other people who have damaged your lives.Someone else made the Comment: The above testimony is clearly not indicative of asociopath because they seem to make efforts to keep from harmingothers, even if it doesn't benefit themselves.And my own Personal comment here: I am living in a group home run by a deeplyempathic and compassionate woman who believes that sociopaths need somekind of help, including medication, and to this end she has helped tosupport me as I searched for a therapist who wouldn't slam the door inmy face as though I had the plague!I was diagnosed as a "primary psychopath" in 1992. It took MORE THANTEN YEARS after that to locate a therapist who was brave enough to takeme on.Even then, she had to adapt at first, learning that, no, itdoesn't automatically make me lie about everything...And that, no, I'm notabsolutely hopeless, despite the "very poor" prognosis the clinicalpsychologist who originally diagnosed me insisted on including in hisown report on me.To my face, he told me I have "no soul," that he couldn't imagine anysane person wanting to be my friend, and that no emotion I everexpressed was real.If I cried during a session, he'd snap at me to cut the act, no one was buying it.Once I was unhappy about impending surgery and he lit into me, callingme "Rebel Without A Cause," which drives me up a wall, sneering at mewith contempt and refusing to accept that what I actually felt was fearand depression. Oh, that's right, I don't have any feelings; I'm just a"fembot"!Right.I was sexually assaulted a number of times while growing up, thefirst at age six; he claimed it was consensual because psychopathicfemales are "all nymphos"!So. Thanks to all the verbal vitriol this man (who is highly esteemedin the professional community, or at least he claimed he is, when hewas bragging to me about what a great man he was, when he wasn'ttelling me I had a massive ego and that I thought I was the center ofthe universe, which frankly I never have) put into my file, no onewanted to touch my case. I even had trouble finding a regular doctorand a dentist!!!MY POINT HERE IS THIS: although you must not allow anyone to abuse you,REMEMBER AS WELL THAT PSYCHOPATHS ARE IN FACT LIVING MEMBERS OF THEHUMAN RACE. Defending yourself against a psychopath is one thing;attacking someone just for being one is quite another. I do not need tohave a conscience to see that!Meaning that certain healthcare givers who smiled grimly andknowingly when looking at my file, and who then have roughed me up orverbally battered me or even hit me, in clinical settings, plus allthose so very pious folks who constantly preach that scum like me oughtto be lined up and shot, are WRONG.How can people know I'm "totally hopeless" if they never give me achance? The therapist I see now is doing just that, and that, incombination with medications that change the ways my nervous systemfunctions, seems to be helping me. Which, of course, is supposedlyimpossible.Well. It's happening anyway, and there are other ones outthere too!So... Any others out there in WikiAnswers?Another psychopath (sociopath) wrote this on another answer:Sociopaths, though born that way, are people too. To avoid an entiregroup of people is absurd. That's like saying, "Since these people havedark skin, everyone should completely avert themselves from them." I ama moderate sociopath, and though part of me doesn't want to change,another does. Many times it is really entertaining to see how stupidpeople can be, especially when they're so gullible as to believe everyword that mellifluously flows from my lips. Yes, I am parasitic, buteven so, there are some people I would like to stop hurting. I can'tfind any websites that can provide a way to help my sociopathy. Maybepeople like you should stop your self-victimisation and start trying toactually help people like me! I knew I was a sociopath before the ageof ten but have only recently had it officially diagnosed. I ameighteen years old now, and I have been lying and destroying others'sanity for a long time. So, please post some helpful tidbits that mighthelp sociopaths resist the sweet urges we get when we encounter weakhuman beings. When you cut us, do we not bleed? When you kill us, do wenot die? Do you honestly think that you're being lied to andmanipulated when we sincerely ask for help. Listen to yourselves! Thisis the internet; ergo, you're safe from our fortified mental grasp.Anyone else?ONE OUT OF EVERY 25 PEOPLE...


Did Denzel Washington visit an brooks army medical center in Texas?

Claim: Actor Denzel Washington made a large donation to the Fisher HouseFoundation after visiting Brooke Army Medical Center.MOSTLY TRUEExamples: [Collected via e-mail, February, 2005]Hi everyone,Dan told me a great story he heard and I wanted to share it with the rest ofyou. Pleaaase spread the word!Danzel Washington was visiting BAMC (Brookes Army Medical Center, in SanAntonio) the other day. This is where soldiers that have been evac'd fromGermany come to be hospitalized in the States. They have buildings therecalled Fisher Houses. The Fisher House is a hotel that soldier's families canstay at, for little or no charge, while their soldier is staying in the hospital.BAMC has quite a few of these houses on base, but as you can imagine,they are almost filled to the brim most of the time. While DenzelWashington was visiting BAMC, they gave him a tour of one of the FisherHouses. He asked how much one of them would cost to build. He got hischeck book out and wrote a check out for the full amount right there on thespot. The soldiers overseas were amazed to hear this story and want to getthe word out to the American public, because it warmed their hearts tohear it. I hope you will spread this story!Don't know whether you heard about this but Denzel Washington and hisfamily visited the troups at Brook Army Medical Center, in SanAntonio,Texas (BAMC) the other day. This is where soldiers that have beenevacuated from Germany come to be hospitalized in the States, especiallyburn victims. They have buildings there called Fisher Houses. The FisherHouse is a hotel where soldiers' families can stay, for little or no charge,while their soldier is staying in the hospital. BAMC has quite a few of thesehouses on base but as you can imagine, they are almost completely filledmost of the time.While Denzel Washington was visiting BAMC, they gave him a tour of one ofthe Fisher Houses. He asked how much one of them would cost to build. Hetook his check book out and wrote a check for the full amount right thereon the spot. The soldiers overseas were amazed to hear this story and wantto get the word out to the American public, because it warmed their heartsto hear it.The question I have is why does Alec Baldwin, Madonna, Sean Penn andother Hollywood types make front page news with their anti-everythingAmerica crap and this doesn't even make page 3 in the Metro section of anynewspaper except the base newspaper in San Antonio.Origins: In mid-December 2004, Denzel Washington - reportedly at the suggestionof a veteran known as "Ranger Jones" whom the actor met while filming the 1988Civil War epic Glory - paid a visit to Brooke Army Medical Center in San Antonio,Texas. The popular actor took part in a Purple Heart ceremony, presenting medals tothree Army soldiers who were recovering in the hospital from wounds received inIraq.The city's Express-News newspaper described one of the medal recipients' reaction toher encounter with the screen star:When Academy Award-winning actor Denzel Washington entered theauditorium at Brooke Army Medical Center, Spc. Connie Spinks, healingfrom wounds from Iraq, was content to hold his hand, get a gentle peck on the cheek and hear him whisper a sweet nothing in her ear."He just told me he was proud of me, and that was enough," said Spinks,who has a broken femur, fractured fibula, shattered ankle, two brokenfingers and second- and third-degree burns on her hands and face.That brief encounter was enough to lift the Asheboro, N.C., native, a worldaway from her memories of Oct. 13, when a suicide bomber killed twosoldiers and injured Spinks, 22, and four others in a convoy."If I wasn't already in a wheelchair, I would have fainted" when the screenstar kissed her, she said.Oh, but there was one more thing she needed. She waved her mother,Annette, up for a hug and kiss from the leading man, who has portrayedyoung military heroes in "Glory" and "Crimson Tide.""I had to do that for my mother," said Spinks, who will be treated at thehospital at least through March. "She's been here for me since October."Fort Sam Houston, which houses the Brooke Army Medical Center (BAMC), alsoincludes on its property two Fisher House facilities within walking distance of themedical center. Fisher Houses are a network of "comfort homes," essentially low-costhotels built on the grounds of military medical centers in the U.S. and abroad thatprovide all the amenities of home and enable family members of servicemen to stayclose to loved ones who areundergoing medical treatment forillness, disease, or injury. Themodest fees charged by FisherHouses (about $10 per night) makethem accessible even to famileswith tight budgets (a situationcommon to many militaryfamilies).As might be expected with theU.S. military's having beenengaged in combat operations inAfghanistan and Iraq for the lastfew years, the demand for spacein Fisher Houses at some military facilities has exceeded their capacities. Accordingto the Fisher House Foundation, when Denzel Washington was at Fort Sam Houston inDecember 2004, he did visit its Fisher House and learn of their need for additionalfacilities, and he did later make a substantial donation to the Fisher HouseFoundation; however, he did not, as described above, "get out his checkbook" on thespot and write a check for the full amount needed to construct a new building:The problem, according to Fisher House President David Coker, is that whileWashington did make a 'sizeable' donation to the program, the e-mail claimis almost entirely bogus."Denzel came to visit with the soldiers and Marines being cared for atBrooke Army Medical Center last December 17th," Coker said. "He visitedwith them and told them how much he respects their service. He alsotoured one of the two Fisher Houses at Brooke Army Medical Center."Washington told Coker at the time he would like to make a commitment tosupport the work of Fisher House."Denzel did not take out a checkbook and write a check on the spot," Cokersays. "He seldom carries a check book with him."Coker said Washington did in fact make a sizeable donation to Fisher Houseseveral months after his visit to BAMC. He declined to comment on the sizeof the donation, but it was not enough to build a new Fisher House.[Coker also] said the fact that Washington, 49, did not write a check 'on the spot' does not diminish his contribution to the Fisher House and hissupport 'for the men and women who serve our country.'Evidently the confusion came about when the commander of the Brooke ArmyMedical Center simultaneously announced plans for a new Fisher House facility(costing about $1.5 million) near BAMC and the news of Mr. Washington's donation.People quite naturally associated the two news items with each other and mistakenlyassumed Mr. Washington had donated the full amount required to build the newfacility.One version of the Denzel Washingtone-mail in circulation concludes: "Bythe way ... He has a son who is aMarine in Iraq." Although DenzelWashington does have two sons (andalso two daughters), neither of hissons is a Marine or is stationed inIraq. At the time this piece firstcirculated, one son was far too youngto be serving in the military (he wasstill a teenager in school), and theolder son, John David Washington,was then a practice-squad runningback with the St. Louis Rams footballteam.Denzel Washington is well known for his philanthropy, reportedly having made largecharitable donations such as $1 milllion to the Children's Fund of South Africa and$2.5 million to the Church of God. We have no idea whether it's true or not, but thefollowing humorous anecdote plays on his reputation for generosity:Denzel Washington was out with friends when a homeless man asked himfor money. The actor's entourage ignored the beggar, but Washingtonhanded him a $100 bill. The man began to cry, then grabbed a passerbyand choked out, "Will Smith just gave me a hundred bucks!"Additional information:Photographs of Denzel Washington's visit to BAMCLast updated: 19 March 2009The URL for this page is http://www.snopes.com/politics/military/denzel.aspUrban Legends Reference Pages © 1995-2009 by Barbara and David P. Mikkelson.This material may not be reproduced without permission.


When did dr barnardos first home open?

the other day. what someone else said.When Thomas John Barnardo was born in Dublin in 1845 no one couldhave predicted that he would become one of the most famous men inVictorian Britain. At the age of 16, after converting to Protestantevangelicalism he decided to become a medical missionary in China andso set out for London to train as a doctor.The London in which Thomas Barnardo arrived in1866 was a city struggling to cope with the effectsof the Industrial Revolution. The population haddramatically increased and much of this increasewas concentrated in the East End, whereovercrowding, bad housing, unemployment,poverty and disease were rife. A few months afterThomas Barnardo came to London an outbreak ofcholera swept through the East End killing more than 3,000 people andleaving families destitute. Thousands of children slept on the streets andmany others were forced to beg after being maimed in factories.In 1867, Thomas Barnardo set up a ragged school in the East End, wherepoor children could get a basic education. One evening a boy at theMission, Jim Jarvis, took Thomas Barnardo around the East End showinghim children sleeping on roofs and in gutters. The encounter so affectedhim he decided to devote himself to helping destitute children.In 1870, Barnardo opened his first home for boys in Stepney Causeway.He regularly went out at night into the slum district to find destitute boys.One evening, an 11-year old boy, John Somers (nicknamed 'Carrots') wasturned away because the shelter was full. He was found dead two dayslater from malnutrition and exposure and from then on the home bore thesign 'No Destitute Child Ever Refused Admission'.Victorians saw poverty as shameful as a result of laziness or vice.However Thomas Barnardo accepted all children and stressed that everychild deserved the best possible start in life, whatever their background -a philosophy that still inspires the charity today.Barnardo later opened the Girls' Village Home in Barkingside, a collectionof cottages around a green, which housed 1,500 girls. By the time a childleft Barnardo's they were able to make their own way in the world - thegirls were equipped with domestic skills and the boys learnt a craft ortrade.Thomas Barnardo strongly believed that families were the best place tobring up children and he established the first fostering scheme when heboarded out children to respectable families in the country. He alsointroduced a scheme to board out babies of unmarried mothers. Themother went into service nearby and could see her child during her timeoff.1905-1939 -- The charity after Thomas Barnardo's deathBy the time Thomas Barnardo died in 1905, thecharity he founded ran 96 homes caring formore than 8,500 children. Residential careemphasised children's physical and moralwelfare rather than their emotional wellbeing.Some homes housed hundreds of children andstaff were sometimes harsh and distant. Manyadults who grew up in the homes look back withaffection and believe the charity was a truefamily. Others remember loneliness, bullyingand even abuse.Child emigration was extended to Australia after the First World War as itwas still seen as an appropriate response to the social problems of the day,even if by today's standards the practice seems cruel. These ideascontinued largely unchallenged until after the Second World War when theemphasis shifted towards keeping children and their families together inthe community.1945- 1960 -- The charity after the WarThe war marked a turning point in Barnardo's development and thehistory of childcare in the UK. Evacuation brought 'charity children' and'ordinary' middle and upper class families into contact with each other andthey gained a greater understanding of their circumstances. Thedisruption of war also improved understanding of the impact of familybreak ups and effects on children brought up away from home.Then in 1946, a national report (The Curtis Report) on children 'deprivedof a normal home life' was published, prompting a revolution in childcare.For the first time, children were acknowledged as the nation'sresponsibility. This report paved the way for the Children's Act of 1948,which placed the duty of caring for homeless children and those in needon local authorities.So, during the 1940's and 1950's Barnardo's began working more closelywith families. The charity awarded grants to families in difficulties becausethe breadwinner was unable to work due to illness or an accident. In themid 1950's it developed a scheme to house whole families affected by illhealth, housing problems, unemployment and crime. By the end of thedecade almost a quarter of the charity's work involved helping children tostay with their own families.1960-1999 -- Changing timesThe 1960s were a time of radical change for Barnardo's. Singleparenthood was becoming more acceptable; greater use of contraceptionmeant that there were fewer unwanted children and improved socialsecurity benefits meant that it was no longer necessary for parents tohand over their children to Barnardo's because they could not afford tocare for them.These developments and the changes in legislationmeant that the number of children received byBarnardo's was decreasing and so a commitment wasmade to cut down on residential services and developnew work with disabled children and those withemotional and behavioural problems. To reflect this,the charity changed its name in 1966 from DrBarnardo's Homes to Dr Barnardo's. By the end of thedecade plans were made to close down large numbersof homes and to convert them into specialist units.In the 1990s, society became aware, through a number of high profilecriminal investigations and public enquiries, that a significant number ofchildren in residential care homes in the UK during the last century werevictims of physical and sexual abuse, neglect and discrimination. Some ofthose children were among the 350,000 cared for in Barnardo's homesbetween the 1870s and 1980s. Barnardo's deeply regrets themaltreatment which some children suffered.Where allegations of abuse are brought to our attention, Barnardo'simmediately informs the police and co-operates fully in any subsequentinvestigation. Our Making Connections service specialises in providingthose who were in Barnardo's care with access to their records, andoffering support to those trying to come to terms with their past -particularly those going through a process of disclosure of abuse.Today we know how institutional care can rarely be a substitute for aproper family life, hence our shift of focus to working with families andcommunities. But, in the circumstances of the time, we believe that thevast majority of those in Barnardo's care had a more positive experienceand received a better preparation for life than they would have donewithout the part that Barnardo's played in their lives.From the 1970s onwards, Barnardo's continued to expand its work infostering and adoption, and family centres were set up in communities tosupport families in deprived areas. They set out to help families facingproblems such as unemployment, poor health, bad housing and poverty,with the aim of defusing the stress and tension that might lead to familybreakdown and child abuse.In 1988 the organisation changed its name from Dr Barnardo's toBarnardo's to reflect the contrast with its Victorian past. The lasttraditional-style home closed in 1989.Barnardo's pioneered schemes for young juveniles and disabled childrenand throughout the 1980s and 1990s developed new areas of work inresponse to public concern over issues such as child sexual abuse,homelessness and children affected by HIV/AIDS.21st Century -- What Barnardo's does nowToday we continue Thomas Barnardo's workand Barnardo's is a leading children's charityworking directly with over 110,000 children,young people and their families every year.Today, we run 394 vital projects across the UKto help some of the most vulnerable childrenand young people believe in themselves.Our projects work with lots of issues; fromfamily drug misuse to disability; from youthcrime to mental health; from sexual abuse todomestic violence. Barnardo's believes we canbring out the best in every child, and that allchildren deserve the chance to fulfil theirpotential.We use our expertise and knowledge to campaign for better care forchildren, and to champion the rights of every child. We also run awardwinning advertising campaigns to help us spread the word aboutvulnerable children.Find out more atbarnardos.org.uk


Where in the KJV Bible does it mention paying ten percent tithes and ten percent offerings?

Tithing in the KJV BibleIf you look up Numbers 18:26-32, it should mention it there. AnswerThe above answer does mention tithing. But the main scripture is in the book Malachi where it talks about how we are cursed if we don't tithe. Also in the bible and I can't remember where and I'm tring to find it it mentions that a tithe is 10% but anything more than that is a gift or offering.In Malachi 3: 8-12"Will a man rob God? Yet you have robbed Me! But you say, 'In what way have we robbed You?' In thithes and offerings. You are cursed with a curse for you have robbed Me, even this whole nation. Bring all the tithes into the storehouse, That there may food in my house, And try me now in this," Says the Lord of Hosts. If I will not open for you the windows of heaven and pour out for you such blessing that there will not be room enough to receive it. "And I will rebuke the devourer for your sakes So that he will not destroy the fruit of your ground, not shall the vine fail to bear fruit for you in the field.Inother words God telling us to test him and see if he wont come through with the promise of such blessings that we can barely contain it. Kinda like the story in John 21 about the disciples who caught so much fish they had to have help getting the net in the boat.Hope this helps