0
The first scientist may have made a mistake, or tailored the experiment to fit either a hypothesis or favorable results. The second scientist's results help to reinforce ar refute the first scientist's results.
What else can I help you with?
Why is it important that scientists' result are evaluated by other scientists?
it is important because we do not know if one scientist's results will be the same as another. I hope I've helped=]
Why is it important that a scientist's result's are evaluated by other scientists?
it is important because we do not know if one scientist's results will be the same as another. I hope I've helped=]
Quality and accuracy are not important to scientists.?
No. Quality and accuracy are incredibly important to scientists. If an experiment is not performed with quality and accuracy it is not valid. However, if accuracy is not especially important, possibly because the result will be the same, then it can be ignored.
Why it is important that scientists perform an experiment more than one time?
because they want to get an acurate result
Why is it important to use constant in an experiments?
so scientists can compare result
Why is peer review important when publishing experimental results?
peer review makes the result more reliable
What are conditional operators in C language?
The conditional operator in C (and C++, C# and other languages) consists of two symbols, '?' and ':'. Together, they can be used to form an expression from three subexpressions:e1 ? e2 : e3The conditional operator is evaluated in two steps; first, the expression e1 is evaluated, if it has a true value, then e2 is evaluated and its value is returned as the result of the entire expression, otherwise (if e1 is false) e3 is evaluated and its value is returned as the result of the entire expression.
What indicators do the experimental result give regarding the purity of the sample?
After a detailed chemical analysis the purity is correctly evaluated.
How do scientists usually communicate and defend the result of an investigation?
How do scientists usually communicate and defend the results of an investigation
When scientists are ready to publish the result of their experimentation why is it important for them to include a description of the procedures they used?
Good science is reproducible, meaning that other scientists should be able to conduct the same analysis and get similar results. If scientists try the experiments and get different results, then it often means that the original publishers did something wrong.
When scientists are ready to publish the result of their experimentation why is it important for them to include a description of the procedures they use?
Good science is reproducible, meaning that other scientists should be able to conduct the same analysis and get similar results. If scientists try the experiments and get different results, then it often means that the original publishers did something wrong.
What indication do the experimental result give regarding the purity of the samples used?
After a detailed chemical analysis the purity is correctly evaluated.
