Want this question answered?
I would say it is the most important, although it can be biased. Archaeology is equally important, less details, but more objectivity.
By questioning weather there source are reliable. (APEX)
It allows readers to evaluate a source for themselves.
They are a firsthand account by a slave.
They are the firsthand account by a slave
The statue was created in the time Octavian Augustus was emperor. A primary source is direct evidence from people who lived in that time period. In this case the direct evidence is a statue and it is the history of a person. The statue is direct evidence so it is a primary source.
try to avoid sleeping in the history class
it gave the whole country one type of money source unlike years before.
When a source for evidence is not convincing or reliable, it should be considered unreliable or questionable. It is important to verify information from credible sources to ensure accuracy and authenticity.
Samuel Pepys was an important source of the study of the lifestyles of the English people and the history of the Neo-Classical period.
The source documents upon which the accounts are prepared will be evidence that the accounts for the business have been correctly prepared.
it tells about a person who was important in the history of our country.
to let the reader know where your evidence comes from.
Rivers are important in early settlement of land. Before advanced technology, it was important to be next to a water source for hydration, food, and travel. Many early cities, companies, and communties in history have been started around rivers.
Bede
I would say it is the most important, although it can be biased. Archaeology is equally important, less details, but more objectivity.
It important to know what a primary and secondary source is because it helps us destinguish a source that happended during the event and a source that the auther wrote from other sourceses that he/she read.