Want this question answered?
Answer this question… Primary sources are created by people who actually experienced the event
It's important to study history because that's how we know who we are and how we came to be here. That's not just "my grandpa came on a boat from Italy in 1903" but why did your grandpa leave Italy and why did he come to America.
Students should always study history. If we don't learn from past mistakes then we are doomed to repeat them. It's important to see what's been done and failed in the past so that we can all grow as a society.
It is important for two reasons (mainly.) #1: Well, it's important to study what people have done incorrectly in the past so we don't repeat it. If we repeat the same mistakes as our ancestors, where would we be in the world today? In conflict, battle or even war? #2: Imagine it! If Paul Revere hadn't done his midnight ride a lot of our ancestors wouldn't have been prepared for battle, meaning they would've died and we probably wouldn't be here today, so it is very important to study history.
Study makes perfect. Study more often
history. Study Island answer
Historical sources are classified as primary and secondary source. The primary source refers to the written or developed document or object during the study and the secondary source refers to the analogy or interpretation of the primary source.
These sources provide information written by other authors.
because history is more important in our life history it give more information about historical place & kings and kingdom
1.archaeologyical sources 2.literacy sources
the field of history. Historians often rely on primary sources such as letters, diaries, and official documents to gain firsthand accounts and evidence of past events. By analyzing these sources, historians can construct a more accurate and nuanced understanding of historical events and their significance.
Historical research often requires the use of many primary sources when presenting a topic. Primary sources such as documents, letters, artifacts, and eyewitness accounts are crucial for historians to analyze and interpret past events accurately. By consulting these original sources, researchers can gain a deeper understanding of the historical context and draw more informed conclusions about the topic at hand.
Archaeologists study written sources to study human life and historians study artifacts to find more about history.
When we study the motive of a primary source's writer, we're looking into issues of potential:
Archaeologists study written sources to study human life and historians study artifacts to find more about history.
rocks
bias