The angle at which the suns rays hit the earth is more nearly perpendicular, therefore more energy is delivered per unit area. Secondly the rays pass through much less atmosphere so less energy is absorbed by the atmosphere.
The energy that reaches the equator is more intense than the energy that strikes poles
Yes, air near the equator is typically warmer than air near the poles due to the angle at which sunlight strikes the earth. Near the equator, sunlight is more concentrated, resulting in higher temperatures. In contrast, near the poles, sunlight is spread out over a larger area, leading to cooler temperatures.
Near the Equator. It doesn't rain at the poles, and snowfall is almost non-existent at the South Pole.
No, centrifugal force is greater at the poles than at the equator because the Earth's rotation causes a bulging effect at the equator that counteracts the centrifugal force. This is why objects weigh slightly less at the equator compared to the poles.
The ocean receives most of its heat along the equator, where incoming solar radiation is about double that received at the poles. Hence, sea surfaces are much warmer along the equator than at the poles.
Yes they are.
It is nearer to the equator.
The equator is the center of Earth. In the center of the Earth it is very hot because of all of the under ground volcanoes.
It is effectively the same distance from both.
Poles
The magnetic field is stronger at the poles.
The closer you are to the poles, the greater the change.