0
What else can I help you with?
Does science support the existence of God?
No, if it did it wouldn't be science.
How does science provide evidence for the existence of God?
Science does not provide direct evidence for the existence of God as it focuses on natural phenomena and observable data. The existence of God is a matter of faith and belief, which is beyond the scope of scientific inquiry.
What is the meaning of learning about science?
In the science, you study the rules of nature. You have pure science and the applied science. In pure science, you study the laws of nature as they are. In applied science, you study the advantages of the science to you and humanity. In my lecture in dental college, I said, " When you study the science, you study the laws of nature. Nature being creation of God, you do are doing a prayer to the God. So when you study a science, you are doing a prayer to God. So you do not need to go to the church or temple to offer the prayers to the God.
Do we have scientific proff of the existence of God?
Science doesn’t have the processes to prove or disprove the existence of God. Science studies and attempts to explain only the natural world while God, in most religions, is supernatural.
What is the science that reveals the secret of God?
If you meant the science that study god by it's 'revelations', the name is Theology (Greek: Theos: God / logos: study?)
Who is the god of science?
Most people in Science would say there is no god, as some parts of Science teach against the existence of a God or Deity, instead processes of natural selection and evolution.
What science is a systematic study of God's creation?
Science does not study religion. As Stephen J. Gould says, science and religion operate, or ought to operate, in quite distinct magisteria. Science is the systematic study of the natural world, while theology is the systematic study of religion. Of course, if we regard theology as a science, then theology is the systematic study of religion and therefore of God's creation.
When did science come into existence?
science came into existence when man did. this is because the definition of science is the study of all or one part of the universe. essentionally, once man gazed opon the stars or tried to figure out where his food came from, science existed.
Is it really possible to study God?
It is possible to study the human ideas of God, and the religious teachings that have been handed down to humans. It is not possible while alive to actually go up to God and study it. However, you can have a personal relationship with God and study religion. God is a Spirit. God does not have a mass. Science is the study of physical things. Since science can study only things that are physical and since God is not physical we cannot use any branch of science to study God. This forces us to conclude that we cannot study about God. There is then only one possible way to study about God and that is if He reveals to us about Himself. Thus to study about God we have to find if God has revealed about Himself to anyone. Some religions claim that God has revealed Himself to them and that they have a record of those revelations in their Holy Book. Therefore studying these Holy Books is the only way we can study about God.
What does Stephan Hawkins say about the existence of god?
He says that science is sufficient to explain the universe, and invoking a god is no longer necessarry.
Identify the type of question that science is not able to answer?
Theological questions like "Is there a higher power/god?" If there was no god - the science would not prove his nonexistence because science doesn't do that. If there was a god - he probably would be powerful enough to hide his existence from scientists indefinitely thus rendering science useless in this matter. That would be it.
If science shows God is a delusion why are so many scientists Christians?
Some people is Science, especially a few in Physics are in Science to prove the existence of god to the world, and say that much Scientific Evidence points to a god, and some say the evidence points to natural process.
