thats funny, noone has answer why people don't have a right to a trial of a jury of their peers. And those peers are empowered to decide.
No, jury nullification cannot be used as a strategy to get excused from jury duty. Jury nullification is the power of a jury to acquit a defendant even if the evidence shows they are guilty, but it is not a valid reason to be excused from serving on a jury.
Jury Nullification
By acquitting a guilty defendant. This is known as "jury nullification."
Jury nullification
north= nullification is good south= nullification is bad
Yes, a jury has the power to nullify a law in a legal trial by choosing not to apply the law to the case before them, even if the evidence supports a guilty verdict. This is known as jury nullification.
Jury nullification gives the People direct control of the law by deliberately and knowingly rejecting evidence, not applying the law or rejecting the law because they believe the law is unjust and it doesn't equate with their sense of morality or fairness; it's a way for the jury to send a message about some larger social issue, or protest the result dictated by the law if it were applied.
The people demanded a bill that would put the nullification process of a previous bill into effect. I'm not sure that's grammatically correct; you may want to google a different sentence.
A Juror should not be impressed by who has the best suit on or who is the best looking witness or attorney.A juror should remember that Judges are people and they can be bias and try to sway a juror to their way of thinking.A juror should read their states and the US Constitution before going to jury duty.BUT MOST IMPORTANT OF ALL A JUROR SHOULD KNOWWHAT JURY NULLIFICATION IS!Jury Nullification allows a juror to decide to vote against conviction even if the person is guilty if :the law is unreasonable or unclear orthe potential punishment does not fit the crimeeven if the party is guilty.NOTE: By LAW the attorneys for either side and even the Judge are not allowed to advise a Jury or Juror that they have the this right of JUROR NULLIFICATION or the case results in a mistrial!
I may be wrong, but it is my understanding that the doctrine of nullification deals with the ability of a jury to nullify the point of law. In other words, just cause you are "technically" guilty of breaking the law, a jury may find that due to extenuating circumstances, it should find you not guilty because of the "spirit" of the law.
to the us to have a bad economy for a while
It has in the past been used by all white juries to find "not guilty" a fellow white man who obviously did kill a black man. Conversely, some black juries have notoriously returned that favor. The dangers of Jury Nullification seem to be solely caused by non-integrated juries. The remedy then is to see to a balance, not to throw out a time tested principle of nullification that helped free those who freed slaves. (Remember, those were all white juries who found those who hid runaway slaves "not guilty", so not all whites or all blacks are bad. Best to keep that balance though, if demographically possible.)