killing is neva right in the first place, but it is understood cuz u are protecting ur country in war....
Beacause more and more people were asking people to not eat burgers because it is killing animals!! Hope thats okay!
While killing is genuinely not considered to be an acceptable act - exceptions are made under specific conventions during wartime. If two nations are at war there are (if the conventions of war are held to high regard) no internal consequences to killing an enemy soldier.
Rephrase this into understandable English.
It's okay if you deem it okay. Or if your parents deem it okay.
The cold war consisted of no killing (no actual war). Vietnam involved killing (real war).
can anybody just put the right answer. chronologically and understandable!
The act of killing is prevalent and absolute in our current civilization, therefore, there is no distinction between the "act of killing in war and killing." The essence of the question, "is killing different then killing in war,"acquiesces the human mind to a state of relativity rather than a state of absolution. When in a state of relativity, justification of killing becomesin absolute.When in a state of absolution, killing is killing. Thus, we understand that we do kill, regardless of the relative nature in current human language.
yes
No technically the war isn't over. In 1994 there was a ceasefire but never an official treaty. The war technically continues till this day because Azerbaijan is using force on the territory killing Armenians and threatening another war.
Unreliable, they kept breaking down, which was understandable...they were new.
When survival is at stake.
War Profiteering Is Killing Us All was created on 2005-08-09.