Nuclear bombing isn't a good thing, but arguably, nuclear bombs are.
Confused? Listen:
Many nuclear weapons, as most will know, are powerful enough to destroy the planet many times over. But if they didn't exist, World War 3 may have begun, becasue everyone was so terrified of using them--they just didn't. They cannot go off accidentally, as they need to be attached to war-heads, so that fear is useless. Basically, if they didn't exist, World War 3 may have happened: but it would have been with guns and planes and smaller bombs etc.
Yes. Atomic and nuclear have the same meaning.
It does not produce CO2.
August 9 1945
It was the United States that bombed Japan to finish the war.
Energy. How we use it makes it a good thing or a bad thing.
Nuclear science was used in the bombing of Hiroshima.
revenge on Japan for the bombing of Pearl Harbor and showing Russia they are willing to use the nuclear bomb.
That was the date that the nuclear age begun.
WWII With the nuclear bombing of 2 of their cities.
Virtually none at the time.
I think the Boston bombing is a very bad thing that can,t be fixed.
It Is a device used to destroy cities and their occupants. A single device has the power of several planeloads of conventional bombs.